Trump threatened to stop weapons for Ukraine unless Europe joined the Hormuz coalition - FT

At least he tried his best

Bro i get you are a troll but like do you at least get paid? Damn you under every single news

Are you sure that USA had nothing to do do with it? Please read:

The Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances.

1) What the agreement was

After the collapse of the Soviet Union, Ukraine inherited the third-largest nuclear arsenal in the world.

In 1994, Ukraine agreed to:

Give up all nuclear weapons
Transfer them to Russia for dismantling
Join the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons as a non-nuclear state
2) What Ukraine received in return

In exchange, Ukraine received security assurances (not full military guarantees) from:

United States
United Kingdom
Russia

These assurances included commitments to:

Respect Ukraine’s independence and sovereignty
Respect its existing borders
Refrain from the use or threat of force
Avoid economic coercion
Seek UN action if Ukraine were threatened with nuclear weapons
3) Who proposed it

The disarmament process was not proposed by a single actor, but rather emerged from coordinated pressure and diplomacy:

The United States played the leading role, pushing strongly for nuclear non-proliferation.
The framework was negotiated among:
Ukraine
Russia
United States
United Kingdom

A key earlier step was the Lisbon Protocol, which set the path for Ukraine (along with Belarus and Kazakhstan) to eliminate nuclear weapons.


AND

The Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances is widely interpreted by governments and legal analysts as having been violated by Russia’s 2014 annexation of Crimea.

1) What the memorandum required

Under the memorandum, Russia (along with the United States and United Kingdom) committed to:

Respect Ukraine’s independence and sovereignty
Respect existing borders
Refrain from threat or use of force
Avoid economic coercion
2) What happened in 2014

In 2014, Russia:

Deployed military forces into Crimea
Took control of the territory
Formally annexed it after a disputed referendum
3) Why it is considered a violation

Most Western governments and international bodies argue that Russia’s actions:

Broke the commitment to respect Ukraine’s borders
Involved use of force against Ukraine’s territorial integrity

For example:

The United Nations General Assembly adopted Resolution 68/262 affirming Ukraine’s territorial integrity
The U.S. and UK formally stated Russia violated the memorandum
4) Russia’s position (for completeness)

Russia has argued that:

The change of government in Ukraine in 2014 altered the political context
The memorandum does not prevent self-determination referendums

These arguments are not widely accepted internationally

Well if Russia takes Ukraine it can be more of a threat to the EU, Russia closer would mean possible imminent threat and if it becomes a war, all NATO member will have to be involved by article 5, so does USA will be involved. So yeah it is a problem for the USA too. If you guys are crying for Iran war because USA get no help from NATO its because IRAN isn't attacking one of the NATO country. Don't forget that NATO is an alliance for defence, not an alliance for attack and invasion.

More like - "hey Europe, I stepped in sh*t, now clean my shoes."