Disliked{quote} The score is not good and below earth on CTI, LUX and Surge. Even they pay it is better not to touch them and just trade on personal account or look for other props.Ignored
I never tried them, I'm just noting this.
Anyone trading with a Prop firm 31 replies
So I accepted a Prop Trading job in South Beach Miami 44 replies
prop firm new model - my trading journey 871 replies
Disliked{quote} The score is not good and below earth on CTI, LUX and Surge. Even they pay it is better not to touch them and just trade on personal account or look for other props.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Just a note TrAndy. While you were away of the thread CTI launched a normal 2 step challenges with pretty normal pricing and targets / static DDs I never tried them, I'm just noting this.Ignored
Disliked{quote} It's very bizarre that they admitted their own mistake to the point of inviting you to go on trading but then they denied the bonus payout.Ignored
Disliked{quote} okay, they have some value then. Around score =4 not bad but not good. And they still have time limits to pass their phases which is not good. Better to avoid.Ignored
Disliked{quote} How do they compare in that score with 5ers ? I'm asking because they also limit 2 steps accounts to 100K. 5ers 100K 2-steps challenge cost $495 with targets 8%+5% and 10% max DDIgnored
Disliked{quote} Ok, I just read the conditions. Yep, they are horrible. We pass a challenge 1 step with static DD but then the DD becomes trailing and the initial payout is only 60% when we achieve 8%.Ignored
Disliked{quote} 5ers score is bit higher like 4.4 with their 2 step offer so better than CTI latest offer.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Would you be so kind to score the legit companies based on your analysis if that's not a trouble for you? I remember you posted something like that quite a while ago but I'm guessing the scores gonna be different due to how much the rules in the companies changed overtime. Thanks in advance.Ignored
Dislikedperhaps it's just me...... both thinkmarkets and 8cap are using the correct MarketInfo(Symbol(),MODE_PROFITCALCMODE) for the indices, yet actual profit/loss math appears to differ by a factor of 10...... as example, roughly speaking due to broker feed differences, a 0.5 lot order with 1 atr targets runs 50$ using thinkmarkets and 500$ using 8cap....... back tests bears this out also..... the ndx pays 120 vs 1200 and so on...... for the same type orders..... from a somewhat worse angle, thinking your max loss will be 120 might turn out 1200........Ignored
Dislikedperhaps it's just me...... both thinkmarkets and 8cap are using the correct MarketInfo(Symbol(),MODE_PROFITCALCMODE) for the indices, yet actual profit/loss math appears to differ by a factor of 10...... as example, roughly speaking due to broker feed differences, a 0.5 lot order with 1 atr targets runs 50$ using thinkmarkets and 500$ using 8cap....... back tests bears this out also..... the ndx pays 120 vs 1200 and so on...... for the same type orders..... from a somewhat worse angle, thinking your max loss will be 120 might turn out 1200........Ignored
Disliked{quote} I don't get it either. After all the noise I also thought they would pay me the bonus they advertised. But instead, they extended their rules to prohibit scaling into a position (which is what I do, and what I've done in the evaluation), repeated to say I was refunded and have nothing to complain about (skipping the part about the bonus of course) and that it was my decision that I refused trading with them which they do not understand but respect. Insane. Would you trade with such clowns again? I doubt itIgnored
Disliked{quote} Bespoke doesn't know the difference between Martingale, grid, and DCA. They keep confusing the terms, removing some, adding some, inventing their own definitions, and then saying they removed DCA and confirming my trading style will now work with them, but then days later introducing new terms like "soft martingale" with the exact same definition that they just confirmed they had removed. Too inconsistent for me. Screenshots for clarification: {image} {image} {image} {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} Bespoke doesn't know the difference between Martingale, grid, and DCA. They keep confusing the terms, removing some, adding some, inventing their own definitions, and then saying they removed DCA and confirming my trading style will now work with them, but then days later introducing new terms like "soft martingale" with the exact same definition that they just confirmed they had removed. Too inconsistent for me. Screenshots for clarification: {image} {image} {image} {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} Bespoke doesn't know the difference between Martingale, grid, and DCA. They keep confusing the terms, removing some, adding some, inventing their own definitions, and then saying they removed DCA and confirming my trading style will now work with them, but then days later introducing new terms like "soft martingale" with the exact same definition that they just confirmed they had removed. Too inconsistent for me. Screenshots for clarification: {image} {image} {image} {image}Ignored
DislikedTFF ... They are legit if your payout isnt massive. Not legit if it is.Ignored