BSV mystery buyer doubles market cap

I've heard CW say some crazy shit, but today he said the most crazy shit I've ever heard in business.

"I went through over 200 audits in a five-year period." - Craig S. Wright

This is not a tweet, it's a statement under oath which can be independently verified by the ATO.

How on earth can someone go through that many audits? And why would they audit him that many times? How is Craig not in jail? So many questions!!!

At 27:15 they talk very clearly about LockTime theory. Sounds like there's a few different ways it could be broken. I'm not sure it's worth further speculating over this with the trial going on. I'm pretty sure we'll have a whole new perspective on things at the end of the month.

Oh boy. Maybe just keep us posted.

I wonder myself sometimes, but how could you concoct something like this and now say the things he has under oath.. Either this version of events is true or he will end up in jail. Hopefully not though, I contract mined btc and had a few of them before the split, I knew little of CSW but ended up backing bch and bsv, got pennies for it, but now hopefully my guess was right and btc starts to go down in history for what it is and has become. Zero or heroes!

coinbase under attack !

He's on a roll!!!

I think what's going on is that CW is such a complicated man that people can't accept his truth. The ATO called him a fraud, and for good reason. The man had a web of companies that make the Italian mafia look boring. So they went after him, to the tune of 200 audits. Yet Craig Wright is still very much a free man. He was operating legally, just on a level the ATO had never seen before.

In that way the ATO and the crypto industry have the same problem: shallow thinking. On the surface CW looks like a liar and a fraud. It takes an incredible amount of time and energy to dig into the deeper story because the way Craig operates is exceedingly complicated. I know this first hand, having spent at least a hundred hours trying to understand the man yet coming away with more questions than answers.

To this day I barely understand Craig Wright. But I'm a fucking expert on frauds, cons, and liars, and Craig Wright is definitely not one of them.

The premise for the BSV trade can be put like this... The crypto industry thinks Craig Wright is a fraud because he looks like one on the surface, but eventually they will understand the deeper story. Just like the ATO did after their 200 audits.

BSV is facing strong resistance at around $200. A move above that would lead to a sharp rally and fireworks!

Here's what the Russian titan has to say about CW:
He make a connection between Donald Trump and Craig Wright, which shows how dumb this guy is when afk. The two men cannot be more different.

Here CW explains why he won't sign as Satoshi until the court recognizes him as Satoshi, or something like that. It's over my head, but I'm picking up that Craig might use the defense portion of the trial to make progress on the strategy.

Vitalik sounds like he is pro big block, just he can't fully admit it because apparently Craig made an esoteric mathematical mistake at some point in time? intellectual snobbery at its finest.

Ouch prices tumbling.

https://twitter.com/murphsicles/stat...971461/photo/1

Thanks FK! This lawyer's perspective makes it look favorable for the defendant. I'm not sure what that means for the BSV trade though. I was thinking it's better for Craig to "lose" this case in some capacity, so he's forced to move coins, but who knows how this thriller will end.

I don't like to debate the "is Craig Wright Satoshi?" question because a) I'm way past that and b) the arguments from the other side aren't based in logic. With that said, this guy makes a concise argument that highlights the mistakes that CW deniers are making:

We're going mainstream baby!!

Wait, what?!? Is this the start of the defense??

https://twitter.com/digitsu/status/1460163955024822272

Good one. I'll give it a listen here soon.

This must be a trend. Today I ran across this proof. It's pretty intellectual but bulletproof nonetheless.