All Majors and Gold | Page 298 | Crypto Craft

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

Stop all and close all trades EA 23 replies

All Majors & Gold, Focused & Censored! 386 replies

Breakout System Most majors and TF's 3 replies

Daily Market Report For All Majors 7 replies

Majors Thread: EUR, USD, GBP, JPY 74 replies

Attachments: All Majors and Gold
Exit Attachments

All Majors and Gold

  • #5,941
  • May 15, 2013 10:01am May 15, 2013 10:01am
Quoting gnomoneey
{quote} I would stay awake....money is calling you
Yes.. After bath I am sitting here watching price dancing haha
  • #5,942
  • May 15, 2013 10:22am May 15, 2013 10:22am
Quoting Tech-A
{quote} As mentioned on my post a few days ago: http://www.forexfactory.com/showthre...66#post6675666 Daily Chart From Previous Post: {image} And also follow up post here: http://www.forexfactory.com/showthre...45#post6677045 1426 broke and target at the 38.2% expansion level is within reach now. No need to get hysterical and trying to guess every tick or where it will be trading each and every day. Just keep it simple, plot out the chart, and have patience for the market to take shape and provide...
Good calls.

For me I try to teach and show others what is happening while I'm in front of the computer.
This way others can benefit from my experience
I try to get others involved.
I try to show other Tf so that they can figure out what kind of traders they are
From your comment you like to leave your trades longer than a day but some here scalps.
Everuome has there own style and showing people different and techniques will hopefully help them develop their own.

Please post anytime your views and contribute.

Thanks

G
Wooooohooooo or Boooooohooooo
  • #5,943
  • May 15, 2013 10:25am May 15, 2013 10:25am
Quoting gnomoneey
{quote} Good calls. For me I try to teach and show others what is happening while I'm in front of the computer. This way others can benefit from my experience I try to get others involved. I try to show other Tf so that they can figure out what kind of traders they are From your comment you like to leave your trades longer than a day but some here scalps. Everuome has there own style and showing people different and techniques will hopefully help them develop their own. Please post anytime your views and contribute. Thanks G
Well said, keep up the good work
  • #5,944
  • May 15, 2013 10:28am May 15, 2013 10:28am
Quoting Tech-A
{quote} As mentioned on my post a few days ago: http://www.forexfactory.com/showthre...66#post6675666 Daily Chart From Previous Post: {image} And also follow up post here: http://www.forexfactory.com/showthre...45#post6677045 1426 broke and target at the 38.2% expansion level is within reach now. No need to get hysterical and trying to guess every tick or where it will be trading each and every day. Just keep it simple, plot out the chart, and have patience for the market to take shape and provide...
nice.
  • #5,945
  • May 15, 2013 10:41am May 15, 2013 10:41am
Quoting gnomoneey
{quote} Good calls. For me I try to teach and show others what is happening while I'm in front of the computer. This way others can benefit from my experience I try to get others involved. I try to show other Tf so that they can figure out what kind of traders they are From your comment you like to leave your trades longer than a day but some here scalps. Everuome has there own style and showing people different and techniques will hopefully help them develop their own. Please post anytime your views and contribute. Thanks G

Just thought I would post my view and see how people take it.

I use both technical analysis and retail positioning to make my trade decisions, what works for me might not work for others. But in my personal opinion, I don't think GOLD is a market one should try and scalp as its mostly macro fundamental orientated rather than technically.

But again, just my personal opinion and wish everyone all the success in their trading, after all we all trade to make money.

ps: I run my own thread in the Journals section, so feel free to pop in and have a read if you want.
Twitter: @JustTradingFX
  • #5,946
  • May 15, 2013 10:42am May 15, 2013 10:42am
this is my elliot wave targets
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: goldh4.png Size: 29 KB
  • #5,947
  • May 15, 2013 11:30am May 15, 2013 11:30am
A hold below 1400 signals a move back to 1322 which was the low posted on April 16, the day of the gold collapse. interim support at 1386 and 1339.
  • #5,948
  • May 15, 2013 11:57am May 15, 2013 11:57am
Hey : Guys Its Gold ..... As i told you few week ago Gold will touch 1390 But some people said its not possible
they think Gold will back at 1550 and 1590 But i disagree with them and i share my Level 1420 / 1390 as u seen Both level Gold hit now i am waiting for 1275 $ Then Longggggggg

ChulL Bull Chull Bull ...............Its Market Lollll
  • #5,949
  • May 15, 2013 12:00pm May 15, 2013 12:00pm
Quoting Malik taxila
Hey : Guys Its Gold ..... As i told you few week ago Gold will touch 1390 But some people said its not possible they think Gold will back at 1550 and 1590 But i disagree with them and i share my Level 1420 / 1390 as u seen Both level Gold hit now i am waiting for 1275 $ Then Longggggggg ChulL Bull Chull Bull ...............Its Market Lollll

1250/75 is the zone to buy IMHO. That's where the institutional orders sit including Jim Rodgers.
Twitter: @JustTradingFX
  • #5,950
  • May 15, 2013 12:10pm May 15, 2013 12:10pm
Quoting Tech-A
{quote} 1250/75 is the zone to buy IMHO. That's where the institutional orders sit including Jim Rodgers.
Jim Rodgers is a charlatan - he never shares his trades and only goes on media to drive prices. Where his buy positions are no one knows and neither does anyone claim to know where institutional orders are sitting. The only indicator that can give some idea is volume.
  • #5,951
  • May 15, 2013 12:16pm May 15, 2013 12:16pm
Quoting EricB
{quote} Jim Rodgers is a charlatan - he never shares his trades and only goes on media to drive prices. Where his buy positions are no one knows and neither does anyone claim to know where institutional orders are sitting. The only indicator that can give some idea is volume.

Hi EricB, you clearly don't know much about it then based on your statement.

Also be careful what you say about people for your own sake, your comments about Jim Rogers could easily be classed as libellous.

"Where his buy positions are no one knows and neither does anyone claim to know where institutional orders are sitting."

I guess you have never seen or used Bloomberg Terminal before then based on that statement?

You can see the institutional order flow on a variety of of sources if you know what to look for. Obviously you don't know about that, hence the uneducated comment.

Also in ForexFactory's best interest, if your going to publicly slate a multi-millionaire/billionaire, then have the proof and evidence to back up your claims, otherwise it is really is libellous.
Twitter: @JustTradingFX
  • #5,952
  • May 15, 2013 12:18pm May 15, 2013 12:18pm
1250/75 is the zone to buy IMHO. That's where the institutional orders sit including Jim Rodgers..hmmmmMmMMm

Teach-A :

I am always waiting for good point to take my position if Gold will break 1265 then i will wait for 1255 then I will place Buy and Sleep for 3 week
  • #5,953
  • May 15, 2013 12:20pm May 15, 2013 12:20pm
Quoting Tech-A
{quote} Hi EricB, you clearly don't know much about it then based on your statement. Also be careful what you say about people for your own sake, your comments about Jim Rogers could easily be classed as libellous. "Where his buy positions are no one knows and neither does anyone claim to know where institutional orders are sitting." I guess you have never seen or used Bloomberg Terminal before then based on that statement?
I have used a Bloomberg Terminal for better part of 7 years. There is no function where you can see another organisations "waiting trades". I have also followed Jim Rodgers calls for the better part of 8 years and know how speculators tend to use the media. I think your statement about me not knowing much is more libelous (since you don't know me) and mine about Jim Rodgers is less libelous since I have followed him, his calls, and his techniques and have sat face to face with him a couple of times.
  • #5,954
  • May 15, 2013 12:26pm May 15, 2013 12:26pm
hello everybody. idont no what you r talking about. but i work well with elliot waves which tells me price should go lower and lower and the initial guarnteed target is 1150. i work since 2005 and elliot waves never mistaken me.moreover crude oil target may reach 25. no one will believe me right now but you will remember me later on.
  • #5,955
  • May 15, 2013 12:36pm May 15, 2013 12:36pm
Quoting forestmanfx
hello everybody. idont no what you r talking about. but i work well with elliot waves which tells me price should go lower and lower and the initial guarnteed target is 1150. i work since 2005 and elliot waves never mistaken me.moreover crude oil target may reach 25. no one will believe me right now but you will remember me later on.

how i can believe ??? will you tell us how Elliot will help us as u think its work good ?
how we can trade with safe zone ?? Explain plishhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Chull Bull Chull Bull.............Its Market LoLlLLlLlL
  • #5,956
  • May 15, 2013 12:39pm May 15, 2013 12:39pm
you can go to google and search what elliot waves means. and how it could predict price .
  • #5,957
  • May 15, 2013 1:02pm May 15, 2013 1:02pm
Quoting EricB
{quote} I have used a Bloomberg Terminal for better part of 7 years. There is no function where you can see another organisations "waiting trades". I have also followed Jim Rodgers calls for the better part of 8 years and know how speculators tend to use the media. I think your statement about me not knowing much is more libelous (since you don't know me) and mine about Jim Rodgers is less libelous since I have followed him, his calls, and his techniques and have sat face to face with him a couple of times.

EricB , look buddy, I'm not going to get into a silly and ridiculous argument with you, I don't have the time to waste on you.

" I think your statement about me not knowing much is more libelous (since you don't know me) and mine about Jim Rodgers is less libelous since I have followed him, his calls, and his techniques and have sat face to face with him a couple of times"

I think you need educated on the definition of what libelous is, to be honest, I think you need educated in a lot of subjects including grammar and spelling, but thats another subject. Your way off track if you think my comments to you are libellous lol! As I said before, if your going to call someone a charlatan, you need to post proof/evidence of the facts, not just your comment and opinion of them, otherwise my friend, that is libellous, not my opinion, its fact!
Twitter: @JustTradingFX
  • #5,958
  • May 15, 2013 1:06pm May 15, 2013 1:06pm
EricB, I'm not having a go at you, just trying to stop you from getting into trouble m8.
Twitter: @JustTradingFX
  • #5,959
  • May 15, 2013 1:26pm May 15, 2013 1:26pm
Quoting Tech-A
{quote} EricB , look buddy, I'm not going to get into a silly and ridiculous argument with you, I don't have the time to waste on you. " I think your statement about me not knowing much is more libelous (since you don't know me) and mine about Jim Rodgers is less libelous since I have followed him, his calls, and his techniques and have sat face to face with him a couple of times" I think you need educated on the definition of what libelous is, to be honest, I think you need educated in a lot of subjects including grammar and spelling, but thats...
No Arguments just facts:

1) You have never used a Bloomberg Terminal - hence your conjecture about it is false and misleading - it would be more useful for users of this forum not be mislead.
2) It is more likely that I know much more about libel law than you as I am a practicing barrister in corporate law.
3) My statement about a public person is not libelous, its an opinion - please see Communications Decency Act of 1996 in the US and Defamation Act UK - before you start making improper legal claims.

As for my spelling/grammar - before you point the finger I would ask you to go check the spelling of libelous - as you have been spelling it incorrectly. I am a native speaker.

I am going to very politely ask that we stick to facts and analysis in here and not point fingers and make silly comments about other users. Whatever I said about Jim Rogers was my opinion about him and I will not get down to your level and start calling you out.

I am not going to respond to any further insults, and whatever you may say will not bother me anyway.
  • #5,960
  • May 15, 2013 1:39pm May 15, 2013 1:39pm
Quoting EricB
{quote} No Arguments just facts: 1) You have never used a Bloomberg Terminal - hence your conjecture about it is false and misleading - it would be more useful for users of this forum not be mislead. 2) It is more likely that I know much more about libel law than you as I am a practicing barrister in corporate law. 3) My statement about a public person is not libelous, its an opinion - please see Communications Decency Act of 1996 in the US and Defamation Act UK - before you start making improper legal claims. As for my spelling/grammar - before...
EricB, as I said to you, I'm not going to engage in silly and ridiculous arguments, I know the facts even if you don't and your repeated claims are hysterical.

ps.. Queens English it's libellous, the yanks are the ones who spell it libelous, as a so called barrister you think you would know that, which is yet another false claim from you, politely speaking your full of it!

Anyway, I will agree to disagree and leave it at that.

Also whats your Bloomberg Code and I will contact you tomorrow on it, I will call you out everyday of the week, becasue I know a bulls***er when I see one. Also please post your PLI License number since your a practicing barrister.
Twitter: @JustTradingFX
5 traders viewing now