Prop Firm Hub

Do you recommend Fundednext? I think they are doing quite good now

no. failed.

i reset that failed account and doing it. 2 days done.

mostly i trade mgc only.

It is too much going on one side.

I passed the eval, 2 nd time after blowing 1 st time since my return to canada.

Congrats! Passing on the second attempt says a lot more than passing on the first. Most traders learn more from the account they blow than the one they pass.

EXPOSING GOAT FUNDED TRADER (GFT) SYSTEM GLITCH
I want to warn the trading community about GoatFundedTrader. My live funded account (ID: 514103962 - Instant Funding PRO Model) was falsely breached during the daily reset, and their customer support is refusing to fix a proven server-side calculation error.
Here is the mathematical proof from their own system logs:
1. Initial Account Balance: $5,000.
2. My Equity at the time of the breach: $4,993.45 (Only a tiny floating loss of -$6.55).
3. Their system flagged a breach stating "Global drawdown exceeded (-0.13%)" and hardcoded my Max Drawdown Level at exactly $5,000.00.
Contradiction 1 (The 90% Rule):
Their support agent (Onyechere) stated in writing that the account is only breached if it drops below 90% of the initial capital ($4,500). My equity was at $4,993.45, which is nearly $500 ABOVE that threshold.
Contradiction 2 (The 4% Trailing Drawdown Rule Failure):
Later, their support claimed that this model features a 4% trailing max total drawdown based on equity, and sent me a system graph.
Looking at their chart data:
- My peak balance reached: $5,299.67.
- If the 4% trailing rule worked correctly, my drawdown limit should have trailed up to $5,087.69 ($5,299.67 - $211.98 allowance).
- Instead, their chart explicitly shows that the Max Drawdown Level remained hardcoded at exactly $5,000.00!
This proves their server completely failed to calculate the trailing drawdown and gave me a 0% drawdown allowance at the $5,000 mark during the daily reset. When I confronted their support agent (Joel) with this math, he simply replied: "There is no discrepancy sir... we don't offer second chances" and closed the ticket.
Their live chat support even stated that they do not reinstate accounts "even in cases of system errors or glitches." This means if their server bugs out, they will steal your funded account and keep your money.
I am attaching all the screenshots and the broken system graph as definitive proof. Avoid GFT!

One more day to go to add to Lucid 50k funded acc.

Hopefully, evening asia makes it.

Never heard of this firm.

I would advise you following firms only for futures

1. Lucid
2. Tradeify
3. MFFU
4. Topstep

Passed 50k LUCID Eval.

Something I rarely see discussed here: checking whether your strategy can actually survive a challenge before you pay the fee.
I build and test automated systems against prop rules, and the number that decides pass or fail is almost never the profit target; it's your worst losing day. Take your last year of results (backtest or live), group the trades by day, and look at the worst one. If your worst day is more than about a third of the firm's daily drawdown limit, you're relying on luck not to breach, because your worst day going forward will be worse than anything in your sample.
When I ran my own numbers this way, it completely changed how I size. I ended up running roughly half the risk I thought I could; my worst day came out under 2% against a 4% to 5% daily limit, depending on the ruleset, and that buffer is the whole reason there were no breaches across every test I threw at it.
The fee is the cheapest part of a challenge. Failing three of them because the sizing was wrong from the start is the expensive part. Does anyone here actually run this kind of check before buying, or did you learn the daily limit lesson the hard way like most?