Intraday only.
1
- #72,381
- Apr 12, 2025 2:44pm Apr 12, 2025 2:44pm
- Joined Oct 2010 | Status: Trader | 21,478 Posts
Intraday only.
- #72,382
- Apr 12, 2025 2:44pm Apr 12, 2025 2:44pm
- Joined Apr 2021 | Status: Trader | 5,844 Posts
{quote} What are SEBI reports? Oh. I got it. Securities and Exchange Board of India. They must know and it must be true what they are saying. I remember when I used to sell courses. I wanted a quick buck to be honest. The market was sucking me dry
Haven't your students ask for a trade explorer though?
You have to have an IQ higher than 90 to interact with this user.
- #72,384
- Apr 12, 2025 3:37pm Apr 12, 2025 3:37pm
{quote} Lets clear the air once and for all. The concepts being discussed Initial Balance, Psychological Levels, and session structures like NY Open, NY Midnight, Daily Open, and CME—are part of trading literature going back decades. No one here invented them, and certainly no one owns them. My references to these tools are rooted in public domain knowledge, widely discussed by traders from Peter Steidlmayer to more modern educators like Steve Mauro, TraderAtHome, TradersReality, and others (dont know if you ever heard of them). If someone applies...
just because market is closed so i am here to clarify in very simple words ,,
read it slowly if you must to really understand what i mean ,,no rush
Let’s settle this with facts, not fanfare.
Initial Balance, Psychological Levels, NY/Asia Opens, CME opens — these aren’t secret formulas or private inventions. They’re foundational elements found in trading literature and used by countless professionals over the years — from Peter Steidlmayer’s market profile to Steve Mauro’s work, TraderAtHome, TradersReality, and beyond.
How you integrate all and making sense of what are being said is the important part .
missD uses these tools because they work. her charts, indicators, and posts have consistently reflected that — not as some repackaged holy grail, but as clear, structured application. And unlike those tossing vague terms to appear elite,
she has actually shared what she use in her previous post.. and apparently erebus is desperately trying to understand them
If that feels threatening to those who just found these concepts recently and built their “mystique” around them — I get it.
But let’s not confuse accessibility with Limitation of understanding .
You Turning public knowledge into personality slandering may work on newer traders, but seasoned traders see through that fast.
And when the conversation shifts from logic to low-level sarcasm or gatekeeping quizzes,
it says a lot about whose argument is running out of ground.
we are here for the market. For the craft. Not for cults.
So let your trades do the talking, not your insecurities.
- #72,385
- Apr 12, 2025 4:10pm Apr 12, 2025 4:10pm
to all who have asked about missd system , for now this is the screen shot i am posting as requested by missd
this is an extension to say that while a lot of new members are really trying to understand and navigate the forex market ,
and despite posting what has worked for her ,
the older members of this forum or self proclaimed guru / sifu seems to be threatened by the FREE knowledge shared ,
and its just not worth the back and forth comments which does not pertain to the topic of the subject
thanks
- #72,386
- Apr 12, 2025 4:21pm Apr 12, 2025 4:21pm
- Joined Mar 2021 | Status: Trader | 1,183 Posts
{quote} just because market is closed so i am here to clarify in very simple words ,, read it slowly if you must to really understand what i mean ,,no rush Let’s settle this with facts, not fanfare.
https://www.metalsmine.com/thread/po...1#post15206291 and https://www.metalsmine.com/thread/po...9#post15206639
More reading can be done here:
https://www.metalsmine.com/thread/po...2#post15206192
https://www.metalsmine.com/thread/po...3#post15206153
I Respect the craft by crediting the craftsmen. Systems evolve, but the foundations were laid by those who shared them first. Innovation without acknowledgment is just rebranding. Great traders build on the work of those who came before them. Giving credit doesn’t diminish your system it strengthens your integrity.
Candlesticks dont move markets, Volume does
- #72,387
- Apr 12, 2025 4:38pm Apr 12, 2025 4:38pm
{quote} Let’s keep this simple. My original message wasnt an attack it was a question, and a fair one. The response you now post acknowledges the use of public tools like IB, Psy Levels, and session opens and now crediting names likeThat’s exactly what I stood up to point out from the beginning. These tools have deep roots. Interpretation is fine—ownership is not, unless written off completely new ground rules. So lets not pretend this was ever about protecting knowledge it was about controlling narrative. For anyone wondering what really started this, here is my original post. https://www.metalsmine.com/thread/po...1#post15206291 and https://www.metalsmine.com/thread/po...9#post15206639 More reading can be done here: https://www.metalsmine.com/thread/po...2#post15206192 https://www.metalsmine.com/thread/po...3#post15206153 I Respect the craft by crediting the craftsmen. Systems evolve, but the foundations were laid by those who shared them first. Innovation without acknowledgment is just rebranding. Great traders build on the work of those who came before them. Giving credit doesn’t diminish your system it strengthens your integrity.Steidlmayer, Mauro, TraderAtHome, TradersReality.
go back to your original post where you were the one who mentinoned those renowned names ,, i was just repeating what you said
https://www.forexfactory.com/thread/...0#post15215370
names you were throwing around ,,
- #72,388
- Apr 12, 2025 4:48pm Apr 12, 2025 4:48pm
- Joined Mar 2021 | Status: Trader | 1,183 Posts
{quote}{quote}
Candlesticks dont move markets, Volume does
- #72,389
- Edited 6:11pm Apr 12, 2025 5:00pm | Edited 6:11pm
{quote} Let’s clear this up too. Saying “these methods aren’t found in books or on the internet” doesn’t hold up when the core components Initial Balance, session structures, psychological levels—are literally drawn from published works and public trading education going back decades. I’ve studied these for years and applied + credited the educators who laid the groundwork—Steve Mauro, TraderAtHome, Steidlmayer, TradersReality, and others. The only thing that’s “not found online” is the rebranding, not the method. Interpretation adds value....
and there it is
you answered it ,, there is no rebranding because it was never for sale,FREELY accesible to those who bothered to read her posts ,
you are getting your panties in a bunch for nothing ,,
- #72,390
- Apr 12, 2025 5:03pm Apr 12, 2025 5:03pm
- Joined Mar 2021 | Status: Trader | 1,183 Posts
{quote} and there it is
No further reply needed.
Candlesticks dont move markets, Volume does
- #72,391
- Edited 7:06pm Apr 12, 2025 5:25pm | Edited 7:06pm
{quote} Ive said what needed to be said. Ive provided the sources, the context, and the timeline. Anyone serious can scroll, read, and decide for themselves. As for the tone you’ve just shown the difference between discussion and distraction. No further reply needed.
ok seem that i have to resort to an analogy so simple that a 10 year old could understand :
Imagine you're exploring a big forest. A lot of people have maps of the forest — they call certain areas things like "Bear Cave," "Magic Meadow," or "River Path." These names help them talk about where they’ve been or where they want to go.
Now, you also explore the forest — but instead of following those maps, you’ve been walking around and noticing cool stuff on your own. You start naming places based on what you see:
"Big Rock Starting Point" (your version of Initial Balance)
"Bendy Tree Zone" (maybe like session structure)
"Spooky Hilltop" (your version of a psychological level)
These names might sound like the ones on the official map,
but you're not using the map. You're just using the names as quick ways to talk about your own discoveries. You’ve made your own trail, your own way of getting around — that’s your MissD method.
So if someone says, “Oh, you’re using the same names as the big map,” you can say,
“Not really — I just gave those names to my own special spots. I explored this forest my way.”
i suggest you to print this and read very slowly for comprehension
- #72,392
- Apr 12, 2025 10:19pm Apr 12, 2025 10:19pm
- Joined Jul 2011 | Status: Gold Again | 10,557 Posts
{quote} apparently Erebus is desperately trying to understand them
Posting a chart marked up with the levels, so others can follow what is being discussed makes me desperate?
The level of assumption is mind boggling, not that I want in on this discussion / argument.
I have come to the conclusion that Initial Balance was first used by the Market Profile analysts; you know those charts with graphs on the side?
I won't bother posting an example, look it up.
And somehow, the term Initial Balance has teleported into the world of Price Action / Day Trading / Market Structure / etc.
And then it's applied to every time frame and market open known to trader, hence the various discussions on what everybody else is doing wrong.
I don't really care, I don't have a dog in this fight, do what you whatever the hell you want to do.
Just have a good time doing, over and out.
It takes a lot for me to IGNORE you, but you can try.
- #72,393
- Apr 12, 2025 10:21pm Apr 12, 2025 10:21pm
- Joined Jun 2013 | Status: enjoying life | 23,847 Posts | Online Now
{quote} What are SEBI reports? Oh. I got it. Securities and Exchange Board of India. They must know and it must be true what they are saying. I remember when I used to sell courses. I wanted a quick buck to be honest. The market was sucking me dry
SEBI published her bio data, check video
Inserted Video
make your own summary now if you know ....................
- #72,394
- Apr 12, 2025 10:33pm Apr 12, 2025 10:33pm
- Joined Apr 2021 | Status: Trader | 5,844 Posts
Call me old fashioned but Initial Balance is how much funds we deposited into our account and IB stands for Introducing Broker 
You have to have an IQ higher than 90 to interact with this user.
- #72,395
- Edited 2:46am Apr 13, 2025 2:25am | Edited 2:46am
{quote} a youtuber was claiming she was earning in several crores from options trading and had a HUGE followers base SEBI published her bio data, check video
To think of why the gang is on MissD's case, it becomes apparent to me that she initially made some bold powerful statements that were just hard to ignore and caused eyebrows to rise.
Such claims are normally made by charlatans to unsuspecting pupils. Not saying that she is a straight fraud because I don't her practices as she might be a profitable trader but that particular claim of her methodology and self proclamation of being in the top 1% of the top 5% of the top 5% of the top 5% of traders is off and very slippery in its energy
6/4/2025 Hey Guys , i set up all my know technical trade , i see this week 7 - 11 Apr will going ranging Gold market price , for the reason is because US financial face a biggest trade war , will make investment banking system fear of long term planning , they will or stay viewing until market comes up some political good for USD , this is a very long process ...... {image}
yes with stop loss about 200 pips , but next my set up 2962 buy limit recovery back it earn 1000pips again . So trading is not about earn how much , and loss how much , it is a finding game we can understand , FIND PLACE LOGICALLY , SET LIMIT , WAIT , Money easy come to your pocket> Come back to mainly , Next week we aim for the Higher low , when have uptrend must have small drop back , SET your buy limit at 3119.60 , SL just little bit 250pips below , 3094.6 , I expect it will down when at Monday or Tuesday , Just set up , this will be a very good RR .
- #72,397
- Apr 13, 2025 3:15am Apr 13, 2025 3:15am
{quote} This is some serious stuff, and to even say that humans should get loans is diabolical. To think of why the gang is on MissD's case, it becomes apparent to me that she initially made some bold powerful statements that were just hard to ignore and caused eyebrows to rise. Such claims are normally made by charlatans to unsuspecting pupils. Not saying that she is a straight fraud because I don't her practices as she might be a profitable trader but that particular claim of her methodology and self proclamation of being in the top 1% of the...
"Fascinating journey, truly. From losing trades with neighbors using brilliant reversal indicators... to suddenly becoming a spiritual watchdog on trading ethics and energy vibrations. That’s some evolution.
Let’s connect the dots, though — because I know others are reading and deserve clarity.
You once taught a neighbor how to draw trendlines, lost money, then went back to university, and by your own admission, you don’t manage capital, sell courses, or have a verified track record. That’s all fine. Respectable even — humble beginnings are where most of us start. as per your own admission in this post
https://www.forexfactory.com/thread/...8#post15215558
. I traded with the guy using indicators like brilliant reversal and moving avarage, teaching him about candles and trend lines. We surely lost some money
But then, with no track record, no public validation, and no confirmed results… you suddenly become the moral compass of this forum? Bold.
To call someone's trading approach ‘diabolical’ for suggesting people educate themselves with skin in the game is a stretch — especially coming from someone who confessed to blowing accounts while teaching candles. Let’s keep that same energy.
MissD’s statement may sound extreme to you, but unlike theory, her posts actually contain charts, forward guidance, levels, and she puts skin in the game publicly in the FREE telegram group . again i am saying FREE
Let’s not confuse cautious hindsight with actual insight.
There’s a difference between watching the race and running it.
And if your claim to credibility is one student and one lady who said no...
you might want to sit the guru comparison bench out.
But hey, at least you're consistent in one thing — consistently observing."
By pretending that she has reinvented a lot, rediscovered "machin" above takes you for quiches. (dudes)
Citation: "I spent months trying to understand and use support and resistance (SNR), supply and demand (SND), fair value gaps (FVG), Fibonacci retracements (Fibo), trendlines, moving averages (EMA), etc. But in the end, I focused only on the previous high, low, and mid key levels. "
She has a problem with exponentials.
Quest: My friend claims that she earns 30% a day on the stock market for months. Am I to believe her?
Rem: "Who reacted to his post, questioned?"
-----
Copilot's response:
It's certainly an extraordinary claim, and while not impossible, it's extremely unlikely in the context of traditional stock market trading. Consistently earning 30% daily over months would require an unprecedented combination of high-risk trades, perfect timing, and market conditions that are rarely sustainable.
Here are a few things to consider:
1. **Compounding Growth**: At 30% daily, her portfolio would grow astronomically within a short period. For example, starting with $1,000, in just 30 days at 30% daily growth, the amount would exceed $26 million. Such exponential growth is hard to achieve, even for the most successful traders.
2. **Risk Levels**: To aim for such high returns, one would typically need to take on immense risks, often leveraging highly volatile assets or financial instruments. Losses, however, could be equally catastrophic.
3. **Market Realities**: Professional traders, including hedge funds with vast resources, rarely achieve such results. If this level of success were consistently achievable, it would be headline news.
4. **Verification**: It's worth kindly asking for tangible proof or examples if you're curious. Perhaps she’s involved in an area you’re unfamiliar with, like high-stakes day trading or speculative crypto investments.
People sometimes exaggerate or misinterpret their returns, perhaps counting only their best trades or ignoring losses. While it's always good to believe in your friend's success, it's healthy to maintain a bit of skepticism until the numbers add up.
Citation: "I spent months trying to understand and use support and resistance (SNR), supply and demand (SND), fair value gaps (FVG), Fibonacci retracements (Fibo), trendlines, moving averages (EMA), etc. But in the end, I focused only on the previous high, low, and mid key levels. "
She has a problem with exponentials.
Quest: My friend claims that she earns 30% a day on the stock market for months. Am I to believe her?
Rem: "Who reacted to his post, questioned?"
-----
Copilot's response:
It's certainly an extraordinary claim, and while not impossible, it's extremely unlikely in the context of traditional stock market trading. Consistently earning 30% daily over months would require an unprecedented combination of high-risk trades, perfect timing, and market conditions that are rarely sustainable.
Here are a few things to consider:
1. **Compounding Growth**: At 30% daily, her portfolio would grow astronomically within a short period. For example, starting with $1,000, in just 30 days at 30% daily growth, the amount would exceed $26 million. Such exponential growth is hard to achieve, even for the most successful traders.
2. **Risk Levels**: To aim for such high returns, one would typically need to take on immense risks, often leveraging highly volatile assets or financial instruments. Losses, however, could be equally catastrophic.
3. **Market Realities**: Professional traders, including hedge funds with vast resources, rarely achieve such results. If this level of success were consistently achievable, it would be headline news.
4. **Verification**: It's worth kindly asking for tangible proof or examples if you're curious. Perhaps she’s involved in an area you’re unfamiliar with, like high-stakes day trading or speculative crypto investments.
People sometimes exaggerate or misinterpret their returns, perhaps counting only their best trades or ignoring losses. While it's always good to believe in your friend's success, it's healthy to maintain a bit of skepticism until the numbers add up.
