Disliked{quote} Pip, I need one more data. Could u share your current maximum and minimum VAR? Thanks before. {image}Ignored
1
Anyone trading with a Prop firm 31 replies
So I accepted a Prop Trading job in South Beach Miami 44 replies
prop firm new model - my trading journey 871 replies
Disliked{quote} Pip, I need one more data. Could u share your current maximum and minimum VAR? Thanks before. {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} This is an odd one......DD has been exponentially increased more than return. My assumption is risk engine was higher during the DD period????Ignored
Disliked{quote} This is absolute nonsense: it’s just completely wrong. {quote} This is a good article, but (as its authors explain) everything in it is very specific to trading individual stocks: it has nothing to do with forex or indices CFD's at all.Ignored
Disliked{quote} So looks like your risk engine will fall between 1.35-1.40.....perfect results, IMO. I prefer to trade smaller and have them increase my size than vice versa.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Its strange to be honest, I didn't trade since the first image was captured. Anyone wants to create a thread on Darwin so that we can share our record weekly?Ignored
Disliked{quote} What lot size or percentage of the margin did you use for it to be considered gambling there? I thought they had a anything goes style for the evaluation phases?Ignored
Disliked{quote} As expected. Darwin has to have a system in place to protect investors. You simply can go down 13K in a couple of weeks without the risk engine stepping in and mitigating risk. Now she will have 2 options. Start a new account or have her leverage severely reduced for a couple of monthsIgnored
DislikedThe one noticeble reduction is Max drawdown is considerably reduced. Minus 13.28 % to minus 2 % now. Returns plus 8.85 % is reduced to minus 0.27 % what she needs to now ?Ignored
DislikedThe one noticeble reduction is Max drawdown is considerably reduced. Minus 13.28 % to minus 2 % now. Returns plus 8.85 % is reduced to minus 0.27 % what she needs to now ?Ignored
Disliked{quote} Reduce trade size by 80%....probably nothing wrong with the strategy......just trading way too large (as most traders do)Ignored
Disliked{quote} Its strange to be honest, I didn't trade since the first image was captured. Anyone wants to create a thread on Darwin so that we can share our record weekly?Ignored
Disliked{quote} As expected. Darwin has to have a system in place to protect investors. You simply can go down 13K in a couple of weeks without the risk engine stepping in and mitigating risk. Now she will have 2 options. Start a new account or have her leverage severely reduced for a couple of monthsIgnored
Disliked{quote} it is learning curve with black box in place. yes, the black box teaches traders forcibly to reduce lot size. she will try this month in order to improve. This month she paid subscriptionIgnored
Disliked{quote} {quote} Yes, all of that is true, but Darwinex Zero doesn't address a trader's ability to recover, and it doesn't have a reward score for runnup. To understand it like this: there's a concept of return (positive and negative), but there's no concept or score for run-up (positive); there’s only a deduction for drawdown (negative). I've been saying this from the beginning: Darwinex needs to establish very clear rules from the start, such as limiting risk to no more than 0.3% per day (for example), rather than cutting returns as a penalty for...Ignored