DislikedObviously, they could definitely pay better on the initial seed capital allocations, as that is not real money. Then again, they are not generating any profit on that money.Ignored
On DAX for example you pay 2,50 € for every lot with Darwinex + spread.
So while the spreads and commissions appear to be competitive overall, they aren’t the lowest and Darwinex probably makes profits by the volume traded right from the start of every trader regardless of the success.
Further (if using the monthly subscription model) they are basically profiting in a similar way to all prop trading firms where probably 99% don’t even reach to any payout they could request but already paid x amount in fees upfront.
So it’s not accurate from them to to say „we only profit if our traders profit“ (even if that’s the long term goal for them). But with so few traders actually trading millions of external investors capital i wonder if that plan works out. For 10+ years in existence shouldn’t there be more growth? Maybe it’s because the real BIG institutional money doesn’t care about darwin’s and so most investors money comes in form of other small fishes (retail investors).
2