This is funny coming from the guys in the CFTC red list
2
Anyone trading with a Prop firm 31 replies
So I accepted a Prop Trading job in South Beach Miami 44 replies
prop firm new model - my trading journey 871 replies
DislikedIf that was the case, instead of announcing an unclear reason, which is extremely fishy and affected their reputation, why don't they just claim it was not their fault, it's all due to the CFTC or regulators, just like they do with other countries that in the sanction lists, give customers a proper, objective reason? That's just my two cents tho, maybe you're right, maybe they just like CableJ said just pure panic behavior.Ignored
DislikedRight again - though some less well-informed and more misguided members here really don’t like hearing this (especially from people with real industry experience).Ignored
DislikedSomething interesting is that FTMO seems to allow non US passports to still operate from US. I don't get the logic of that because they ares still in US territory.Ignored
Disliked{quote}-Because as a US passport holder, you are owned by the US government. All tax laws and regulation will apply to you, making you radioactive to most foreign, financial entities that would be subject to burdensome and costly compliance, should they choose to offer services to you. This is why renunciation is becoming a popular option, especially as many countries are offering citizenship-by-investment options, and some of those countries even have zero tax.Ignored
Disliked{quote} I get that but if serving US is a "crime" I don't see how serving a German living in US is not a crime. Besides, following your logic of US people being owned, FTMO should not serve a US person living in Italy. It's a decision that seems illogical. They (non passports) are still commiting the "crime" in US "soil".Ignored
Disliked{quote}FTMO will not be taking any US citizen wherever they live, its a matter of citizenship not residence.Ignored
DislikedI do not believe that anyone here thinks that some regulatory oversight is a bad thing.Ignored
Disliked{quote}FTMO will not be taking any US citizen wherever they live, its a matter of citizenship not residence.Ignored
Disliked{quote} That's not what the announcement says. They don't allow US clients (national) both in US and US overseas territories. If they would forbid an US citizen in Italy from purchasing then they would say all american citizens worldwide. {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} That's not true. Demo traders were having better conditions than market. STP were simply getting market conditions. And some STP were high frequency and/or high volume so they were being hit with market conditions that they were not used in the demo environment. BTW, what about if they were lying and the CEO was living like a monk in a monastery or giving all profits away to charity ? Would that change the facts in dispute ?Ignored
Disliked{quote} That's not true. Demo traders were having better conditions than market. STP were simply getting market conditions. And some STP were high frequency and/or high volume so they were being hit with market conditions that they were not used in the demo environment. BTW, what about if they were lying and the CEO was living like a monk in a monastery or giving all profits away to charity ? Would that change the facts in dispute ?Ignored
Disliked{quote} what's your opinion on what FTMO's legal team & management are thinking by banning new US customers but still allowing their existing US traders to operate. If they are responding to the CFTC, I can't see how they believe that will fly in the eyes of the CFTC. it doesn't seem to make any logical sense.Ignored
Disliked{quote} They would never do that because that would be assuming that they are not sure or confident that they are law abiding. It would even even prejudicial in a future legal case if they said that. Therefore a general vague statement is clearly a better reason (and it's obvious that the reason is the MFF case).Ignored