Disliked{quote}-Yes. This has been the issue all along... how to define this. Either it is, or it isn't. If it is, well, then licensing, fees, reporting, compliance et al. are all going to be required. If it isn't, then it's just gambling, which is a whole different list of requirements. Even though these firms may be operating in a sort of gray area in some respects, regulators will not accept that. They likely see it as circumvention and will look to punish.Ignored
But in the same breath, the cftc complaint contradicts that based on marketing, again all prop firms fall into this. So.... ... who the fuck knows. The fact of the matter is this wont' be the last. I wouldn't be surprised if another SRO comes out before new year.
1
2