Dislikedmff rating on trustpilot lowered to 4.8 from 4.9 most issues are about slippage and huge spreads. is this real?Ignored
- #14,985
- Edited 9:12am Apr 15, 2023 8:37am | Edited 9:12am
- Joined May 2016 | Status: Trader | 6,296 Posts
Anyone trading with a Prop firm 31 replies
So I accepted a Prop Trading job in South Beach Miami 44 replies
prop firm new model - my trading journey 871 replies
Dislikedmff rating on trustpilot lowered to 4.8 from 4.9 most issues are about slippage and huge spreads. is this real?Ignored
Disliked{quote} I would take time and thing again about 1 step. All what I learnt here is precious. You just need a 3% more profit with a 2 step challenge to get big benefits! I think the best for now is to try the MFFX 2 steps with NO LIMIT. If you choose them, please use "ECN" as affiliate code, it's my code. Hope it helps. Just to remember: MFFX was the real best Phase 1 program with an "absolute" drawdown. Few days ago they changed it and now is exactly as TFT and FT+ as trailing drawdown to Initial Balance will be an issue to look at. This mean that...Ignored
Disliked{quote} Sorry. Which is your account size? they allow 300K, so 1 of 300K or 200+100. And then there is the scaling.... so very hard to say that you reached the max account size. And nothing to do with payout. I wouldn't get ansia if for a payout I need to wait sometime more. You are in the top 1% of who achieved a funded account and may be in the top 0.5% even get a payout. When you are diversified, you will spend this time on other accounts, funded, or challenge, or you'll simply relax. This business is a nightmare for traders. Their goal is to...Ignored
Disliked{quote} any review about fidelcrest?I think fidelcrest have largest prop account provider among others,anyone have any experience with them?Ignored
Disliked{quote} first of all Funded Next has not MT5 but only MT4 as you teached me, not many using them. That's why is not in the top 5-7 you use. and finally, is so hard to pass challenges and make a portfolio of accounts that till you will make a portfolio with FTMO MFF TFT etc will pass so many time that you won't arrive to diversify with Funded Next and some other player like may be MFFX, E8, 5ers etc will be better option to try.Ignored
Disliked{quote} I would take time and thing again about 1 step. All what I learnt here is precious. You just need a 3% more profit with a 2 step challenge to get big benefits! I think the best for now is to try the MFFX 2 steps with NO LIMIT. If you choose them, please use "ECN" as affiliate code, it's my code. Hope it helps. Just to remember: MFFX was the real best Phase 1 program with an "absolute" drawdown. Few days ago they changed it and now is exactly as TFT and FT+ as trailing drawdown to Initial Balance will be an issue to look at. This mean that...Ignored
Disliked{quote} I used MFF week ago. Their spread was good. Only I can complain for crypto... with a large spread and no trading in weekend. German DAX had 0 spread! many times, don't know how they can do it. Sometime I have seen OIL with zero spread. How possible? I was in eval challenge. MFF is good. About slippage we have to check when it happens, if during news, how many pips, and this happen even in Ic Markets with huge slippages there and a tiny book.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Exactly right. Everyone goes in with the intention of passing, correct? Therefore, you must look at what you receive after passing.....do you want 6% max loss or 10-12% max loss? Do you want trailing DD? Once you pass, you get the conditions and rules of the model you passed! Said it many times, and I'll say it again......the 2 step challnege IS NOT FOR EVERYONE.....if you fall in that group, save your time and energy and just continue trading and compounding your own account......the reason being when you do instant funding and/or 1 step...Ignored
Disliked{quote} I have 200K+100K funded so maxed out with them (not counting their current promo which allows additional 250K) I'm not too much worried about the trading pause in general, I just inform you all here that it happened, some seem little more sensitive to it :-) I contacted the support mainly because the approval took much longer than usual assuming something's wrong. As for holding back, I don't think speaking up reasonably would be risky. From what I can see on Discord all these firms are flooded with a constant streams of so stupid and arrogant...Ignored
Disliked{quote} 1 step challenges would have to show up in the market with identical value for money that the 2 steps. This means that they would have to be much more expensive, which would destroy the product. Therefore, they implement rules like (much) worse rations of target/max loss or trailing stops to be able to present a not scaring price. I doubt we will ever see a good 1 step challenge.Ignored
Disliked{quote} any review about fidelcrest?I think fidelcrest have largest prop account provider among others,anyone have any experience with them?Ignored
Disliked{quote} Exactly right. Everyone goes in with the intention of passing, correct? Therefore, you must look at what you receive after passing.....do you want 6% max loss or 10-12% max loss? Do you want trailing DD? Once you pass, you get the conditions and rules of the model you passed! Said it many times, and I'll say it again......the 2 step challnege IS NOT FOR EVERYONE.....if you fall in that group, save your time and energy and just continue trading and compounding your own account......the reason being when you do instant funding and/or 1 step...Ignored
Disliked{quote} Real market conditions equals real slippage. Firms that do not have this will not last......I promise.Ignored
Disliked{quote} 1 step challenges would have to show up in the market with identical value for money that the 2 steps. This means that they would have to be much more expensive, which would destroy the product. Therefore, they implement rules like (much) worse rations of target/max loss or trailing stops to be able to present a not scaring price. I doubt we will ever see a good 1 step challenge.Ignored
Disliked{quote} I'm only sensitive to the time it takes to reset one's account. When you trade with multiple firms, the actually payout cycles are irrelevant as you can stagger them to be getting paid every week or even every couple of days. The downtime is unacceptable, if you are a profitable trader, this is lost income. Not talking MFFX here, more TFTP and TFF. TFTP touts how they are the 3rd largest, right behing MFF and FTMO, yet their payout and account reset process ranks behind literally evry firm including all of the new ones.Ignored
Disliked{quote} What kills the Phase 1 is the trailing/relative drawdown! that kill it completely. Also would kill on Instant Funding and there is not there.... so the Phase I in some how is even worse of the Instant Funding (for the drawdown only I mean)Ignored
DislikedLux's current offer. Based on the screenshot, it seems, like their new platform is based on Trading View. Scaling rules {image} Commissions FX: 2$ per round lot, Stocks 0.005$ per share, Crypto 0.05% of volume, Energy and Indices: no commission, Metals; 2$ per lot Prop Trading Firm | Funded Trading Accounts (luxtradingfirm.com) {image} The constraint of 1 asset class per account still applies. "You can have one account per asset class (Forex, Indices, Commodities) – meaning a maximum of 3 accounts in...Ignored
Disliked{quote} 1:10 leverage and relative DD are big minus on this prop. They don't even bother to explain on their site how the relative DD works so many people might get fooled about it.Ignored