{quote} You repeatedly suggested to review your log. I say - nobody cares about 16 trading days. It tells nothing so it would be waste of time
Ignored
The sequence of events was 2 people accusing me of being gamblers, hence the post to ask them to review the log (which clearly showed growth slowing and a plan to manage risk).
In the first place, the people who claimed I was subtle advertising are the ones who kept drawing attention and attacking my TE when I spoke nothing of it.
{quote} The sequence of events was 2 people accusing me of being gamblers, hence the post to ask them to review the log (which clearly showed growth slowing and a plan to manage risk). In the first place, the people who claimed I was subtle advertising are the ones who kept drawing attention and attacking my TE when I spoke nothing of it.
Ignored
You initiated the gambler conversation by stating prop firms are marketed to attract gamblers. I simply stated you must define yourself as such as well, with a 670% return in 18 days.
{quote} You initiated the gambler conversation by stating prop firms are marketed to attract gamblers. I simply stated you must define yourself as such as well, with a 670% return in 18 days.
Ignored
Which you also stated that you agreed with my comment.
You were the one who went on to draw attention to my TE.
Done with the conversation. As you can see none of us here lay out the welcome mat for commercial agenda. Market yourself somewhere else.
Actually, you created the TE 12 hours ago. Pretty sure most of us here already know who you are, Kramer.
{quote} lol, you disabled the live link to yes, I do. Classic, it was live earlier today. You commercial folks are something else, you really are.
Ignored
Yes, but that topic had already long died out, so don't build a strawman argument here. We were looking at a timeline of our conversation, not my reply to another poster.
{quote} Yes, but that topic had already long died out, so don't build a strawman argument here. We were looking at a timeline of our conversation, not my reply to another poster.
{quote} The sequence of events was 2 people accusing me of being gamblers, hence the post to ask them to review the log (which clearly showed growth slowing and a plan to manage risk). In the first place, the people who claimed I was subtle advertising are the ones who kept drawing attention and attacking my TE when I spoke nothing of it.
Ignored
Well, then let me be the third one. I have seen so many traders like you with strategies delivering even lower performance. And still, all have burnt their accounts within a few months. Yes, you can earn a lot along the way. If you're clever you will put some profits aside. But it's still gambling. Short-time profitable gambling. Therefore I don't care about your log now. Let's talk about it in 160 trading days
{quote} Well, then let me be the third one. I have seen so many traders like you with strategies delivering even lower performance. And still, all have burnt their accounts within a few months. Yes, you can earn a lot along the way. If you're clever you will put some profits aside. But it's still gambling. Short-time profitable gambling. Therefore I don't care about your log now. Let's talk about it in 160 trading days
Ignored
Let's make it fun. If this account is still around and well on Christmas (a little under 160 trading days), what happens?
