Prop Firm Hub

Quoting JotaP

Disliked

{quote} The definition might have been originated from MetaQuotes (MT4/MT5) which use it consistently, including in reports from the platforms' Strategy Tester.

Ignored

Quoting Vitore

Disliked

{quote} I see, thank you. That kind of explains it as I never used MT :-) and cTrader doesn't use it this way But I must admit the MT definition makes sense when you get used to it

Ignored

Quoting Koop

Disliked

{quote} Wait what? even when you were starting out? you never used MT4? I thought it was older than Ctrader.

Ignored

Quoting Vitore

Disliked

{quote} Well yes MT4 was first released in 2005, cTrader in 2011. I started trading CFDs in about 2016 I guess when both platforms were already available and established. But I didn't know anything about their histories or market share back then. It's just that MT4 looked and felt so terrible to me I thought it was doomed to die out soon so I chose what looked modern, professional and much easier to use. Only later on I found out that most traders still keep using MT :-D So yes, been using MT4 for about 15min in my life :-)

Ignored

Quoting Masterrmind

Disliked

{quote} If you like cTrader then you probably also like NT8. They are both my choice over MT4 for sure but I simply decided to get used to several trading platforms. Masterrmind ........

Ignored

Quoting Koop

Disliked

The Beginning of the End of Funding Talent {image}

Ignored

Quoting Koop

Disliked

The Beginning of the End of Funding Talent {image}

Ignored

Quoting QAndy

Disliked

{quote} ...and when you take their (FT) own words that they grew so much recently that changes had to be made ? It makes sense when having view from a certain distance. For me the conditions on FT are still #1, then MFF #2, and FTMO #3. FT just doing some switches to adjust the recent growth of new members. When there is no rule change anymore, then FT would be considered #1 in the prop firm space more clearly, like it was last month in July e.g., when they had best conditions far far away from any competitors. They are still better in conditions...

Ignored

Quoting Nsak3y

Disliked

The language seems to indicate possible pressure from regulatory groups. A more important point to note is that they seem to be admitting to running a ponzi-type program, unless I am misinterpreting this.

Ignored

Quoting Nsak3y

Disliked

The language seems to indicate possible pressure from regulatory groups. A more important point to note is that they seem to be admitting to running a ponzi-type program, unless I am misinterpreting this.

Ignored

Quoting pipmaster77

Disliked

{quote} Man, would I be pissed. Not even about the money. The time invested in passing 2 stages of an eval, multiple times if you have a larger account. They just come out and say, EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY, screw your livelihood, your income is cut off IMMEDIATELY. Anyone that joins any of their other programs deserves exactly what they get. We have been warning people in this thread for months.

Ignored

Quoting Takisd

Disliked

I mean... I want to gloat with the whole I told ya so's. But... I feel bad for the folks who actually put their time and effort into this. If anything, I am glad to see a sociopath bite the dust. But sad to see the tarnished reputation of the industry. The regulators are coming.

Ignored

Quoting Dao-trades

Disliked

{quote} Feel the same way, I'm worried about what will happen to FTMO and MFF, if this makes a big impact - do you think regulators will be fine with their business models?

Ignored

Quoting Dao-trades

Disliked

{quote} Feel the same way, I'm worried about what will happen to FTMO and MFF, if this makes a big impact - do you think regulators will be fine with their business models?

Ignored

Quoting pipmaster77

Disliked

{quote} IMO, they have got their shit together for the long haul. Takisd could probably confirm this as well. However, you know being the vindictive bitch that she is, Jessica will try to take down the entire industry.

Ignored