Are you saying you're now a funded trader at MFF (i.e. passed both Evaluation phases), @takisd?
Congrats, if so.
Kindly keep us updated...
Congrats, if so.
Kindly keep us updated...
Amor Fati--F. Nietzsche
2
Anyone trading with a Prop firm 31 replies
So I accepted a Prop Trading job in South Beach Miami 44 replies
prop firm new model - my trading journey 871 replies
Dislikedthis darwin shit isn't as beatiful as paulmf aka darwinexpayme (for a side hustle) described. they don't accept trading on my own account. they just want me to trade their accounts until the score is right and then i will qualify for some funding.. no thanks i would rather trade my account with commissions or spread rebates and additionally for example 5ers and i will do better. why? because i will receive real money from my IB and my profits and i heard that 5ers pays on monthly basis no matter how much you've earned.. darwinex pays 15% QUARTERLY...Ignored
DislikedThanks i found a good trading system . Test #1will be completed after 10 days of trading {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote}. May be worth adding the URL for prop funds if you have them handy.
Ignored
DislikedThis one has appeared very recently. Very competitive to say the least. But no track record I'm afraid. There are some videos on Youtube plus an interview with the owner (if that means anything!). https://tradersprop.com/funding-modelIgnored
Disliked{quote} This one is definitely on my radar. It ticks many boxes and the trading conditions appear ideal. Probably too early to get any feedback regarding payouts but I’d certainly like to know. Fewer trading rules to abide by as opposed to FTMO and that fee ... well its looking very tempting. Masterrmind ........Ignored
Disliked{quote} Looks OK BUT. Has a "Daily" loss rule which is a big trap & a no no for me.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Looks OK BUT. Has a "Daily" loss rule which is a big trap & a no no for me.Ignored
Disliked{quote} ?? how the a daily dd limit of 7% more restrictive ( a big trap?) than a 4% max dd? "I've decided to give Lux Trading a go. Still only 4%DD but realistic target criteria & good scaling plan. Time will tell." you dont make any sense.Ignored
Disliked{quote} ?? how the a daily dd limit of 7% more restrictive ( a big trap?) than a 4% max dd? "I've decided to give Lux Trading a go. Still only 4%DD but realistic target criteria & good scaling plan. Time will tell." you dont make any sense.Ignored
Disliked{quote} You need to appreciate the way the daily DD works. If you have a 2% dd on day 1 & still hold that into the next day, you then only have a 2% daily DD for day 2. & so on. It will catch you out big time. The Daily DD is a huge trap. I would not go anywhere near a plan with a daily DD rule. Put it into practice. You will soon see what I mean.Ignored
Disliked{quote} You need to appreciate the way the daily DD works. If you have a 2% dd on day 1 & still hold that into the next day, you then only have a 2% daily DD for day 2. & so on. It will catch you out big time. The Daily DD is a huge trap. I would not go anywhere near a plan with a daily DD rule. Put it into practice. You will soon see what I mean.Ignored
Disliked{quote} i could explain you, just how silly this what you wrote. but frankly, not worth my time. wish you best of luck and a sorting out of your numbers, both on relation to max dd vs daily dd limit, as well as target% vs daily or max dd. all i can say is to reiterate that you make no sense ( mathematically. i dont care feelings). the time limit is a different issue.Ignored
Disliked{quote} You need to appreciate the way the daily DD works. If you have a 2% dd on day 1 & still hold that into the next day, you then only have a 2% daily DD for day 2. & so on. It will catch you out big time. The Daily DD is a huge trap. I would not go anywhere near a plan with a daily DD rule. Put it into practice. You will soon see what I mean.Ignored
DislikedWhat Basill was trying to say is that: In some prop-firms when your are finally "funded", the drawdown rule is not to lose more than a predefined value calculated at start. Let's say 5% of $100,000 ($5,000). What Basill is trying to remark here is the fact that if you increase your balance, let's say to $150,000, you can't go back to $145,000 because you are out (unfunded). Instead, in Lux Trading Firm, when you are "funded", the drawdown rule is not to reach some specific equity level. In this specific case is 4%. Using the same example above mentioned...Ignored
DislikedWhat Basill was trying to say is that: In some prop-firms when your are finally "funded", the drawdown ruleIgnored
Disliked{quote} Further to that with tradersprop you have a 9% target & only 30 days to get there. With lux Trading I have forever to get 6% Go Figger.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Lol don't turn this thread into one of your confrontational clown shows. You're just looking for a reason to attack me when you don't even have a clue what's being discussed. That is not what Basil is addressing. He is not talking about relative drawdown vs absolute drawdown! He is comparing a Daily loss limit of 5% and Max loss of 10% to Lux's max loss of 4%. Your explanation is beyond senseless Paula. Take some time to read and understand before you start rambling and turning this place into something else. {quote} {quote} More proof that...Ignored
Disliked{quote} You need to appreciate the way the daily DD works. If you have a 2% dd on day 1 & still hold that into the next day, you then only have a 2% daily DD for day 2. & so on. It will catch you out big time. The Daily DD is a huge trap. I would not go anywhere near a plan with a daily DD rule. Put it into practice. You will soon see what I mean.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Unacceptable post. You keep your misogyny attitude, insults, etc. I think what I say in my post (very respectful as always) makes sense based on what I read here: {quote} Can I be wrong? Yes, but does not make me a clown nor Paula nor etc.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Further to that with tradersprop you have a 9% target & only 30 days to get there. With lux Trading I have forever to get 6% Go Figger.Ignored