DislikedHow accurate is the most accurate tester method (EA)??? is the result the same as in live trading?Ignored
.ex4/.ex5 files can't be fixed or modified / I'm not a coder!
1
I will code your pivot EAs for no charge 28 replies
I will code your scalping EAs for no charge 163 replies
Oanda MT4 - Indicators and EAs not showing 2 replies
EAs and indicators relating to moutaki... 22 replies
InterbankFX has loaded its MT4 platform with custom EAs, indicators and scripts 1 reply
DislikedHow accurate is the most accurate tester method (EA)??? is the result the same as in live trading?Ignored
Disliked{quote} Thank you!! the spread is very important because I scalp trade. I test the EA robot on FTMO demo. The spread of indices on FTMO broker is very good. I struggled day and night with all kinds of indicators, robots, settings. And I tried all kinds of strategies. And finally I made an insanely good robot. This is the only one that worked. Unbelievable, but it never loses. On average, it produces 70-130% profit on the robot tester. I found a very good indicator that I managed to set up for accurate and very, very fast trading. It is very good...Ignored
Disliked{quote} I can tell you what it is: It's something you didn't think about... Maybe because you still don't know how everything works. Try it out in FTMO! Let us know what happened! BTW: Does FTMO guarantee Stops? You know, the tester will always guarantee the Stops. PS. I can show you much better test results than yours...Ignored
Disliked{quote} That's right! I'll test it on a live demo account starting tomorrow. And then I'll test it on a live account too. can you show the result? is that EA profitable every month???Ignored
Disliked{quote} Thank you!! the spread is very important because I scalp trade. I test the EA robot on FTMO demo. The spread of indices on FTMO broker is very good. I struggled day and night with all kinds of indicators, robots, settings. And I tried all kinds of strategies. And finally I made an insanely good robot. This is the only one that worked. Unbelievable, but it never loses. On average, it produces 70-130% profit on the robot tester. I found a very good indicator that I managed to set up for accurate and very, very fast trading. It is very good...Ignored
Disliked{quote} Két példa a teszteredményekre: {image} {image} És ezek minden tesztidőszakban így működnek!Ignored
Disliked{quote} Two examples of test results: {image} {image} And those work like that for any test period!Ignored
Disliked{quote} OMG! very rude! This is serious! And is it always profitable in live trading? What kind of strategy is this? Headgear?Ignored
Disliked,,What you show in your picture can never work in real live trading...,, why?Ignored
Disliked{quote} The first one is specific to only one broker. It's the Boom/Crash, and it only works in the tester. In reality the broker will never fill the Stop Loss order at the required price for this to work. The tester will always fill your Entry and Stop orders at the required price. You see, the Boom and Crash Synthetic algorithm is very simple to beat. The only problem is that it will not fill your Stop Loss order at your price. Every Boom, and every Crash is a "no-liquidity" move. IOW, the Stop Loss will be executed at the end of that move, no...Ignored
Disliked{quote} .... Grid Strategy, meaning that it opens orders in one direction, averages them, and closes as soon as there is profit. This also will not work in a real market, because at one moment it will lose everything it had made, and more..Ignored
DislikedGreetings, After reading some of the more recent posts: Don't trust the System Tester. Use it only to confirm that trades are being taken as expected, then spend your time FORWARD testing to fix the bugs. This is especially true when you're trying to figure out why this works in the System Tester but not in real life..... Here is an example of why you cannot trust the tester. Improving the quality of the test to 90% did shed some light as to why this doesn't work, but overcoming the problem unfortunately is still elusive. {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} BTW: Does FTMO guarantee Stops? You know, the tester will always guarantee the Stops.Ignored
Disliked{quote} /*-------------------------------------------------------------------- Change-log: sm3BarFractalBreak MTF v2.4.0 Date: 08-01-2025 By: MwlRCT -------------------------------------------------------------------- - Enhanced instance isolation with improved uniqueID implementation: - Added robust object management across timeframes to ensure proper cleanup and reuse of objects. - Improved multi-instance support to allow multiple instances of the indicator on the same chart without conflicts. - Ensured compatibility with both current and custom...Ignored
int limit = Bars - 1;
// Tính toán giá trị cho mảng sto
for(i = KPeriod+DPeriod+Slowing-1; i >= 0; i--)
{
sto[i] = iStochastic(NULL, 0, KPeriod, DPeriod, Slowing, MAMethod, PriceField, MODE_MAIN, i);
}
double lsma_sto1 = 3.0 * iMAOnArray(sto, 0, LSMAPeriod, 0, MODE_LWMA, 1) - 2.0 * iMAOnArray(sto, 0, LSMAPeriod, 0, MODE_SMA, 1);
double lsma_sto2 = 3.0 * iMAOnArray(sto, 0, LSMAPeriod, 0, MODE_LWMA,[size=3][b] 2[/b][/size]) - 2.0 * iMAOnArray(sto, 0, LSMAPeriod, 0, MODE_SMA,[size=3][b] 2[/b][/size]); // Safety check for array bounds
if(limit < 2)
{
Print("Not enough data for LSMA calculation");
return;
}
//---- Calculate LSMA values
double lwma1 = iMAOnArray(sto, 0, LSMAPeriod, 0, MODE_LWMA, 1);
double sma1 = iMAOnArray(sto, 0, LSMAPeriod, 0, MODE_SMA, 1);
double lwma2 = iMAOnArray(sto, 0, LSMAPeriod, 0, MODE_LWMA, 2);
double sma2 = iMAOnArray(sto, 0, LSMAPeriod, 0, MODE_SMA, 2); //---- Trade management
if(Buy_lsma && !old_buy)
{
CloseOrders(OP_SELL);
if([b]TimeCurrent() - last_signal_time > Period() * 60[/b])
{
OpenOrder(OP_BUY);
last_signal_time = TimeCurrent();
}
} DislikedGreetings, After reading some of the more recent posts: Don't trust the System Tester. Use it only to confirm that trades are being taken as expected, then spend your time FORWARD testing to fix the bugs. This is especially true when you're trying to figure out why this works in the System Tester but not in real life..... Here is an example of why you cannot trust the tester. Improving the quality of the test to 90% did shed some light as to why this doesn't work, but overcoming the problem unfortunately is still elusive. {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} Thank you!! the spread is very important because I scalp trade. I test the EA robot on FTMO demo. The spread of indices on FTMO broker is very good. I struggled day and night with all kinds of indicators, robots, settings. And I tried all kinds of strategies. And finally I made an insanely good robot. This is the only one that worked. Unbelievable, but it never loses. On average, it produces 70-130% profit on the robot tester. I found a very good indicator that I managed to set up for accurate and very, very fast trading. It is very good...Ignored
Disliked{quote} I have no opinion about what you’ve created; I hope you can profit from it. In my opinion, FTMO is not that great. I tested its demo before and wasn’t very satisfied with it. I hope it works well for you, though. However, there’s something I feel you haven’t considered: Assuming that the spread will always be zero, under all conditions, with no changes in the spread—when the target is very small, even if you’re making a profit, is the commission also zero? The likelihood of reaching a point where 80-90% of your profit goes toward commission...Ignored