- Search Crypto Craft
- 274 Results
- csternfx replied Sep 5, 2019
The requalified order flow has parameters for min/max swing size. If you just waited for a 38.2 correction, you could in theory have your swing go on for forever so you have to pick a number of ticks to decide its been too extended. After you do ...
- csternfx replied Aug 26, 2019
As far as I know it has to do with number of winning trades. I think you simply get more trades because 38.2 pullbacks that end up winning are more common than 61.8 pullbacks that end up winning. So even though winners are smaller, you get more ...
- csternfx replied Aug 26, 2019
Its worse. You miss out on winners that offset your losers.
- csternfx replied Aug 26, 2019
This one I can answer. Say he buys 100 contracts. There is probably not 100 available at the same price on the bid so he gets 20 at a price, 20 at another price, and so on. Each of these buys is a separate trade to ninjatrader. You will see it on a ...
- csternfx replied Aug 9, 2019
Wasn't suggesting you personally. I should spend less times on finance sites reading comments from people. Can't believe how many cheerleaders zero hedge has. But I completely agree, bring on the movement of some sort.
- csternfx replied Aug 9, 2019
I always find it interesting that so many people want the market to crash. I don't know if they "want" it to really, but doom and gloom is in their nature. I mean do you really get excited if it does crash and you are right? Woo hoo jobs lost and ...
- csternfx replied Apr 26, 2019
Technically the yellow oval area did not pull back to the 38.2 of the downswing. Tough area to do anything. I would have taken number 1 though. Then if you continue, number 2 makes sense. You had an expectation failure and should expect a deep ...
- csternfx replied Apr 18, 2019
It would seem I'm defining my swings slightly different. I don't disagree with your assessment. Going to do a little more chart studying. I feel I could have still come out on top, but could also do better. On the third trade, I was hoping price ...
- csternfx replied Apr 18, 2019
This is how I should have trade today if I was perfect in live conditions. These are not my actual trades. You can see my actual trades on the chart. 3 trades for -35. If I was a robot and did what I should have... +94. The third trade was a short ...
- csternfx replied Apr 2, 2019
Any chance you can use an RDP connection? Some work places don't think to block those. You can setup your home PC to allow RDP connections and then connect to it from work. Thats how I do it.
- csternfx replied Mar 25, 2019
If US30 trades like forex, it could have been the bid that did it. You might be charting the ask. Have had this happen with forex before.
- csternfx replied Mar 22, 2019
I wonder if the NinjaTrader software itself counts the number of demo connections it has had? Not sure how to find that out. You clearly ruled out any IP address conflicts.
- csternfx replied Mar 5, 2019
I sure didn't enjoy it. Normally will pass on those type. I've had a good run past couple of days so more willing to risk. Its a flaw really.
- csternfx replied Mar 5, 2019
+114 on the day. Long ride on pain train
- csternfx replied Feb 27, 2019
Had no idea that was happening with PMs. That sucks people do that. Concur with sentiment of rant.
- csternfx replied Feb 21, 2019
Which range bar type did you try? I played with Sierra chart over the weekend and I don't recall which range bar type you want, but the its not the one that seems most obvious. I would play around with those since I noticed the same thing. I was ...
- csternfx replied Jan 31, 2019
Nice January. Mine went to crap in the middle. I think around 100 points for the month. When I look back at trades if I followed my plan or not, its about 55% I can say followed my plan. So still not bad I guess all things considered.
- csternfx replied Oct 19, 2018
The mechanical part is nice. I've taken to giving more room on trailing if the move breaks previous structure high or low with some force. If it looks like it is struggling to get past structure I keep it tighter. In this particular case, trailing ...
- csternfx replied Oct 19, 2018
It hadn't reached the 1:1 or 127 yet based on the reference swing. However the bulls were slowing down. Not sure I'd be too worried about it. I'm no expert and probably would have done the same. You could maybe trail based on the previous immediate ...
- csternfx replied Aug 31, 2018
I would consider it 2 expectation failures back to back. There are clear NSLs, however the last one was weak and occurred after 2 100% retracements. It had the higher chance to fail. I would not consider the first blue line 1 swing. You can always ...