At least to be considered successful in Darwinex Zero, we already know the categories: 1. Positive Index (above 100) 2. VaR below 6.5% 3. Current Risk Ratio of 1 or above So far, I see that only Pip's data matches the category, and Trader #2 Silver ...

darwin discussion

This is Darwinex Dzero, so we should always remind ourselves of the right model. Actually, I don't like the idea of right role models; it's more effective if we find anti-models, and the anti-model is the "gambler trader," right? So, even if the ...

darwin discussion

GBPUSD Short Trade After the Frankfurt Open, there was high activity (volume) in the previous resistance zone.

PVSRA (Price, Volume, S&R Analysis)

Good or not good according to Darwin, not us, because we are trading on Darwinex Zero. #1 will be penalized next month. Yes, he will receive a 375k allocation, but what will he generate afterwards? Meanwhile, #2 will receive a similar allocation ...

darwin discussion

He is not considered a 'good' type by Darwin, so I think you should avoid it.

darwin discussion

If you say it like that, we go back to the mindset that profit is everything. It's not me who made the categorization, but Darwinex Dzero itself; we can see many of Darwinex videos told that. Still does not change the ...

darwin discussion

Opening many trades and achieving an 83% win rate doesn't necessarily mean one isn't a gambler type. A trader can open numerous trades and win during a trending market, but that doesn't mean the risks they take don't exceed Darwin's guidelines. The ...

darwin discussion

Darwinex Silver Update August 2024 See Strategy Analysis, Signal Account Risk Management Based Darwinex Rules VAR < 6.5% a month: #1 MSDK - Gambler Type #2 ATWF - Darwinex Type #3 OSC - Gambler Type #4 AFEH - Darwinex Type (Exceed a bit) #5 FVX - ...

darwin discussion

Not me but the Trader 1 above Check this video, may be it can help u (Actually, my first account was penalized before, wasn't it? Are you losing your memory now?) Handle With Care... url

darwin discussion

Ya. url

Prop Firm Hub

Yes, like I said here: url

darwin discussion

The Maximum VAR is the highest recorded VAR ever taken by a trader, while the Minimum VAR is the lowest, period in a month.

darwin discussion

Trader 2. Trader 1's risk ratio will definitely be reduced next month (punishment).

darwin discussion

Update Info and Some Revision Broker-backed Prop Firm Add Vantage Elite

Prop Firm Hub

Trader No.1 and No.3 in DZero Silver this August have a gambler's character (overleveraging). After waiting for a considerable period until their current risk ratio stabilizes (penalty period), they go YOLO. Trader No.2 fits exactly the ideal trader ...

darwin discussion

My trade setup on Monday will be based on the highest daily range pairs based on ATR specific period, with the actual range being determined by the indicator on Monday. 28 Pairs Range Update Daily (25/08/2024) ...

Zorox Orders Technology

Yes below 1.00x Absolutely. VAR decide Risk Ratio. video

Prop Firm Hub

Overlimit D-Leverage above 9.75 -----> Overlimit VAR above 6.5% -----> Current Risk Ratio drop below 1 -----> Index slowly raising if generate profit Underlimit D-Leverage below 9.75 -----> Underlimit VAR below 6.5% -----> Current Risk Ratio raise ...

Prop Firm Hub

Yes that VAR, overlimit more than 6.5% a month, now lets see you Current Risk Ratio, is it drop below 1?

Prop Firm Hub

How to increase the index if VAR is more than 6.5% per month? Of course, your Current Risk Ratio will drop. Who finds it easier to raise the index if the Current Risk Ratio = 2x, or 1.40x like Pip compared to 0.71x or 0.12x or 0.50x?

Prop Firm Hub