- Search Crypto Craft
- 272 Results
- Richardj replied Sep 7, 2007
I made two predictions: My main prediction was that I said that I believed that GJ would drop to 231.70 area 'pretty soon'. That prediction was correct. I also said that I thought it would go there, before your 235.50 target. That prediction was ...
- Richardj replied Sep 7, 2007
Sorry... I meant that we'll go back up to 233.00 or just below from around here.
- Richardj replied Sep 7, 2007
Yes, from 231.00. Back up to 233.00 or a little below.. and then down.
- Richardj replied Sep 7, 2007
Back to 233.00 area now
- Richardj replied Aug 30, 2007
I can't resist giving you a prediction that is based SOLELY ON A 15 MINS CHART NOW - and we will see if it correct or not. If it is, then your statement that you can't trade on 15 minutes' charts was clearly totally incorrect! From my 15 minutes' ...
- Richardj replied Aug 30, 2007
M2B - thanks for your message. What I constantly forget, when posting anything on this thread, is not merely that you guys on this thread use technical trading methods that have virtually nothing in common with my methods - but more to the point, ...
- Richardj replied Aug 30, 2007
I'm sorry if you've already discussed this.. but I've just come on the site... Are the charts looking absolutely strange to anyone else? As if some force has just been pulling them up, and up - regardless of their SMA structure, etc., and the normal ...
- Richardj replied Aug 30, 2007
Thanks very much, Godfrey! Unfortunately though, I don't have MT4. But very interesting, anyway!
- Richardj replied Aug 30, 2007
Thanks a lot!
- Richardj replied Aug 30, 2007
Karmo, did you see the question I asked you, about why (I thought) you said on your thread that you measure fibs at different time scales?
- Richardj replied Aug 30, 2007
Mmmm... well, I must have been doing terrible measurements before, to have always returned different results, then! But then what is the point (if I understood him correctly) of Karmo saying that he measures fibs in different time scales? And as for ...
- Richardj replied Aug 30, 2007
To me, based on the fibs I just gave, I think we will definitely achieve 230.96 - and very likely the lowest of the three, 230.12. (In fact, I suspect this is going to be a very big drop - maybe well below any of these fibs).
- Richardj replied Aug 30, 2007
Karmo, you measure from and to the same two prices, for different time scales, don't you? (re the response just now, saying that I'm bound to get the same results from different time intervals). Did you find that you got the same 'matching' three ...
- Richardj replied Aug 30, 2007
That seems strange.... really? But even though I've got very little experience in doing fibs - only about a week's worth - I've many times drawn from the same price to the same price for those three different time intervals - and I've NEVER got the ...
- Richardj replied Aug 30, 2007
What I didn't explain very clearly was that when I was trying to calculate fibs yesterday to estimate how high GJ would rise, I noticed a similar type of confluence... not so accurately as the ones I gave - but a bit similar. Then, as you've seen ...
- Richardj replied Aug 30, 2007
From 227.40 to 234.52 prices shared by 1, 4 and 8hr were: 231.80; 230.96; 230.12
- Richardj replied Aug 30, 2007
Just to clarify... for example, I got 230.96 from 1h, 4h and 8 hours.
- Richardj replied Aug 30, 2007
Karmo, could I ask you a question? According to my fib measurements of this big retrace since yesterday, I was very surprised to get the EXACTLY the same prices for fib 38.2, 50.0 and 61.80 from 1 hour, 4 hours and 8 hours! Isn't that really weird? ...
- Richardj replied Aug 29, 2007
Thanks. I had little doubt about fib's amazing (to me) usefulness, having seen Karmo use them with such incredible accuracy and success. But he is an absolute master of them... and I wasn't sure that I would get the hang of it. But yesterday, I put ...
- Richardj replied Aug 29, 2007
Thanks very much - I'll look at it.