- Search Crypto Craft
- 8 Results
- scherzi replied Sep 10, 2023
I would add a few more degrees of freedom to the formula. Price can move up or down 1 tick. 50% on that. Price can move up or down 2 ticks consecutively 25% of probability on that assuming independence. Price can move up 2 ticks and then 4 ticks ...
- scherzi replied Sep 10, 2023
And another final post for now. More about market structure and orderflow. Think in a candlestick and the hours, days of the month, months in a year or 6 years that have more volatiliy (candle size). Which is the typical shape of these long candles? ...
- scherzi replied Sep 10, 2023
Regarding the structure, orderflow and volume or open interest. There are different ways to explain it. But the trading sessions (Europe/Americas/Asia) leave above and below them a lot of liquidity. Also the 50 % of the range they create define a ...
- scherzi replied Sep 10, 2023
Hi, maybe it could also be considered that is not the surplus but the algorithms the markets are programmed with that move prices. Surplus may be a trigger, but also arbitrage, for instance, where the main target is not allocating orders but getting ...
- scherzi replied Sep 10, 2023
The market maker is the market. I mean, someone that owns a set of computer programs and equipment that creates a digital market. One of the features of that software is pricing assets. Then pepople come in and interact with that software creating ...
- scherzi replied Sep 9, 2023
1:1 RRR with simple orderblock setup on H1 tf after London markets open time. With potential extension below the closest support where SLs reside and there is liquidity to close our short positions with their sell stops. image Now, the same ...
- scherzi replied Sep 9, 2023
Secondly, many times it is your setup that dictates your TP and SL, meaning risk and reward. See, this is a typical ICT setup (1:2 RRR) with annotations of the premium levels that should be key to consider exiting before the TP if price requires it. ...
- scherzi replied Sep 9, 2023
Hi, I have been discusing this same topic with a few colleagues recently. I think 1:1 is something you can achieve barely 100% of the times, while 1:2 it is not like that. 1:3 is harder and 1:4+ starts to require multi-timeframe analysis. Besides ...
- Posts by Member Search: 'scherzi'