- Search Crypto Craft
- 39 Results
- DClearsky replied May 3, 2017
cindy cindy cindy cindy.. ive been seeing your posts for several years now and im glad to finally learn that sometimes you drink, which causes or else i really didn't know what to think! you're a good guy anyways, i feel like ...
- DClearsky replied May 3, 2017
Let it be a comforting thought that monetary gain is not the sole indication of a happy successful life. So where most of us might have been unsuccessful as traders, if we learned something from our journey as traders about the world and ourselves, ...
- DClearsky replied May 2, 2017
63 traders viewing.. I mean, I knew this was a zoo.. but never thought I'd see a unicorn though!
- DClearsky replied May 2, 2017
is that freakout i see down there! sir, it's an honor.. we've kept your thread alive sir. image
- DClearsky replied May 2, 2017
Well. if i showed up at Golddman Sachs they would probably cry... tears of despair, from the fact that they've gone insane for letting me show up. I tried visiting FXCM in New York once, I couldn't even get past the front desk without an ...
- DClearsky replied May 1, 2017
i fast forwarded to 49:00 and i see he looks at volume, and he is an intelligent trader.. but like you said, and i agree, looking at volume in FX is useless because it is a decentralized market. If i remember correctly, there is FX volume available ...
- DClearsky replied May 1, 2017
agreed, trap or no trap, retail traders trap themselves by hoping the market will do what they think. and not recognizing signs to get in or get out. traders couldn't tell a bear trap even if it had their leg tightly clamped in its metal jaws. don't ...
- DClearsky replied May 1, 2017
are we talking about a rabbit hole.. or some other hole?
- DClearsky replied May 1, 2017
You did a good job highlighting where sellers should take profit! Those channels on your chart though.. they seem sort of off.
- DClearsky replied May 1, 2017
man.. i would love to stay in wonderland for a while longer. we got the madhatter, white rabbit, tweedledee and tweedledum. cheshire cat and the red queen. but there comes a time when we all gotta wake up. the best times might be that sense of ...
- DClearsky replied May 1, 2017
please, these are just the basics. if you don't do volume analysis, you don't need DOM depth of market or VSA. if you don't do technical analysis, then you don't need technical indicators. if you don't do fundamental analysis, then you don't need ...
- DClearsky replied May 1, 2017
damn Vee, where were you seven years ago when I needed to hear this? you might have just saved a ton of people from heartbreak, insanity, and/or bankruptcy!
- DClearsky replied May 1, 2017
numbers were first introduced into the world in order to keep better track of debts. in a small group of humans, maybe 100 ppl, it was easy to remember who owed what to whom. in order to have a viable larger community, thousands of people, there ...
- DClearsky replied May 1, 2017
lol. the whole forex is about 85% of losing traders leading more and more traders down a losing path. some maths: If 85% of traders lose, and if one out of ten traders care to come out and teach.. Then you get 8.5 losing teachers compared to 1.5 ...
- DClearsky replied Apr 30, 2017
Live slippage to me shows that the broker isn't playing any games. Slippage occurs due to the aggregated quotes from the liquidity providers (tier 1 banks). Although with good liquidity, slippage should be minimal. Red flag should be when you get ...
- DClearsky replied Apr 30, 2017
agreed. imagine expecting to break even +0 pips on every losing trade, but instead getting -0.2 pips on those trades due to slippage. or one trade +5 pips, another trade -5pips. but instead getting +4.8 and -5.2 . so why do self driving cars still ...
- DClearsky replied Apr 30, 2017
i wouldn't underestimate the power of Breaking Even. spreads matter a lot in this case. imagine your EA was able to break even on a platform offering 1.2 pips spread. now you take that same system to another broker offering 0.8 pips spread. you ...
- DClearsky replied Apr 30, 2017
looks similar to a backtest i had before. it comes out looking like steps / stairs. the few winning trades increase your equity, and the majority of trades which are losing trades are set to minimized loss or BE. so, losing trades will result in a ...
- DClearsky replied Apr 29, 2017
I'm telling you guys, all my trades are right. It is the markets that are wrong.
- DClearsky replied Apr 29, 2017
It seems rather odd, somehow, that Taoism, the way of the Whole Man, the True Man, the Spirit Man (to use a few Taoist terms), is for the most part interpreted here in the West by the Scholarly Owl—by the Brain, the Academician, the dry-as-dust ...