-
Trump: Actual numbers would have to pay back if Supreme Court were to rule against the US on tariffs, would be many hundreds of billions of dollars
[truth_social_post=115883475463948362;0]The actual numbers that we would have to pay back if, for any reason, the Supreme Court were to rule against the United States of America on Tariffs, would be many Hundreds of Billions of Dollars, and that doesn’t include the amount of “payback” that Countries and Companies would require for the Investments they are making on building Plants, Factories, and Equipment, for the purpose of being able to avoid the payment of Tariffs. When these Investments are added, we are talking about Trillions of Dollars! It would be a complete mess, and almost impossible for our Country ... (full story)
Added at 10:15am
- Comments / Top
- Subscribe
bluesteele
Jan 12, 2026 8:32pm
Permalink
lakayorex.21
Jan 12, 2026 10:24am
Permalink
Trader#B749
Jan 12, 2026 11:08am
Permalink
Trader#B915
Jan 12, 2026 11:40am
Permalink
Trader#1DDA
Jan 12, 2026 12:30pm
Permalink
-
Related Stories
WHITE HOUSE: TRUMP BELIEVES IN INDEPENDENCE OF FED WHITE HOUSES LEAVITT SAYS TRUMP DID NOT DIRECT DOJ TO INVESTIGATE FED CHAIR POWELL
Good evening. On Friday, the Department of Justice served the Federal Reserve with grand jury subpoenas, threatening a criminal indictment related to my testimony before the Senate Banking Committee last June. That testimony concerned in part a multi-year project to renovate historic Federal Reserve office buildings. I have deep respect for the rule of law and for accountability in our democracy. No onecertainly not the chair of the Federal Reserveis above the law. But this unprecedented action should be seen in the broader context of the administration's threats and ongoing pressure. This new threat is not about my testimony last June or about the renovation of the Federal Reserve buildings. It is not about Congress's oversight role; the Fed through testimony and other public disclosures made every effort to keep Congress informed about the renovation project. Those are pretexts. The threat of criminal charges is a consequence of the Federal Reserve setting interest rates b FED'S POWELL IN STATEMENT SAYS JUSTICE DEPARTMENT ON FRIDAY THREATENED CRIMINAL INDICTMENT RELATED TO HIS SENATE TESTIMONY LAST JUNE POWELL SAYS THREAT OF CRIMINAL CHARGES IS A CONSEQUENCE OF FED'S SETTING INTEREST RATES BASED ON ITS ASSESSMENT OF THE PUBLIC INTEREST RATHER THAN THE PRESIDENT'S PREFERENCES *POWELL: THIS IS ABOUT WHETHER FED CAN SET RATES INDEPENDENTLY