- Search Crypto Craft
-
Noisy replied Mar 8, 2026Yes, true. But it’s also possible you buy a booster after x drawdown and your drawdown will even increase from there on.
darwin discussion
-
Noisy replied Mar 8, 2026Got it. Yes, i was only referring to the time aspect in regards to the discounted prices for the boosters. I like to keep things simple. Stacking boosters every week/months over one or even several darwin’s sounds like a lot of „operational time“ ...
darwin discussion
-
Noisy replied Mar 8, 2026A 3-month 25k booster costs a one-time fee of $140. If you had to repurchase it every 3 months, you would pay $140 twelve times over the 3 years. That's a total cost of $1680. A 3-year 25k booster costs a one-time fee of $505. Have I missed ...
darwin discussion
-
Noisy replied Mar 7, 2026I still don't quite understand, but it's okay. A 25k booster that costs $140 for 3 months seems far more expensive than a 25k booster for 36 months that costs $505 or what I am missing?
darwin discussion
-
Noisy replied Mar 7, 2026How did you arrive at that calculation? From 500 to 10000? What was done, and over what period of time?
darwin discussion
-
Noisy replied Mar 7, 2026Yes, whether it's tactically smart to pay upfront for the maximum allocation of boosters for three years is another question. I was just looking at the costs and the potential profit one could expect if, as Pip says, one were to make 3% per month. I ...
darwin discussion
-
Noisy replied Mar 7, 2026All the boosters can be purchased for 3 years. The maximum allocation of boosters over 3 years, consisting of two 200k boosters and one 100k booster (500k total), would cost $9,945. A 3% monthly return compounded over 36 months results in a total ...
darwin discussion
-
Noisy replied Mar 6, 2026Can you quantify how much active trading time (in hours) you invested in the 3 Darwins over the 13 months, how much in fees you incurred, and what you received in payouts? Do you still aim for Gold/Investors over virtual allocations/ boosters etc.?
darwin discussion
-
Noisy replied Mar 6, 2026Great! How long did it take you to reach gold with your Darwin? I stopped all trading-related activities for the last two months and also took a break from all screens. The last system I tried yielded mixed results. I'll have to see how/if things ...
darwin discussion
-
Noisy replied Jan 5, 2026Happy New Year to you all! Just canceled my Darwinex Zero subscription. I started at the worst possible time, suffered a -5% drawdown in December. The maximum drawdown ncreased to 8%. Another 45 euros down the drain... The only good thing was a ...
darwin discussion
-
Noisy replied Dec 22, 2025My new Darwin was created today. Reducing the number of markets from 5 to 3 and decreasing the position size per order from 0.25% to 0.20% has given me a current risk factor of x1.35 as compared to x0.50 with my previous Darwin. Return (since ...
darwin discussion
-
Noisy replied Dec 21, 2025Yes, I think this is the logical consequence of thousands of failures and setbacks over the last 15 years. My self-confidence is pretty low. That's my impression too. No single strategy works in all conditions. Discretionary traders likely have an ...
Trading for a living
-
Noisy replied Dec 21, 2025I don't quite understand that statement. With a filter, I'm not trying to change the strategy itself, but as you say, simply to increase the chances of success for the entry trigger and to get fewer "false breakouts." I hate that word because it's ...
Trading for a living
-
Noisy replied Dec 17, 2025Thanks. Yes, that's my impression too. It's not my developer. It's the author from whom I bought the ORB system. I'll send you the link right away. No, I don't actually want to trade ready-made black-box systems or signals, but I'm starting to feel ...
Trading for a living
-
Noisy replied Dec 17, 2025Hey. I don't know anything about PoC, and this isn't a thread for PoC. I'd advise you to start your own thread about it. No offense.
Trading for a living
-
Noisy replied Dec 16, 2025The answers, by the way, came from Google Search AI (Gemini), not GPT. I spent a few more hours researching yesterday and today, and from many different sources (not just AI), I'm getting the overwhelming impression that implied volatility might be ...
Trading for a living