- Search Crypto Craft
- dukas_trader replied Sep 7, 2017
ok Tony: i help you again . looks like its a big work to do with you to bring you out of your beginner level. -"You wrote novel-long unstructured messages, all full of mistakes and all tangled up words, no Capitals, no ponctuation." sorry, but you ...
Central Banks & Big Players
- dukas_trader replied Sep 7, 2017
are you sure you are not in margin call situation at this time??? and will be closed immediatly? the margin call and stop out level should be reached by this method at the moment by closing the 2 lot sell. i dont know what simple broker you use, but ...
Can we really beat trading costs?
- dukas_trader replied Sep 7, 2017
but you tell so the people, the bank you worked in was only bank in planet, who got filled all orders without slippage, amazing. amazing, all other bank i know had slippage. you tell so only 2 things, you are a big liar because of all, or you was ...
Central Banks & Big Players
- dukas_trader replied Sep 7, 2017
you dont trade any bigger lots with hedging then without, not even 0,0000001. you calculate it wrong. you dont go any higher then your leverage like before. only net is important. if you trade 1 mio sell in eurusd and 2 mio buy you trade 1 mio buy. ...
Can we really beat trading costs?
- dukas_trader replied Sep 6, 2017
oh man, ok i help you again. ofcourse you did it wrong many years, ofcourse i accept many are better then you, because you have near null understanding of market and behavior and fake most! - when slippage is so little (like you fake all the time) a ...
Central Banks & Big Players
- dukas_trader replied Sep 6, 2017
most people learned wrong what is spread! there is an normal middle price (middle of ask and bid)=MP. the true payed spread for your order is: ask-MP + MP-bid. ask and bid and MP are always calculated to the time you open and close ofcourse! so easy ...
Can we really beat trading costs?
- dukas_trader replied Sep 6, 2017
sorry baby , but you tell bullshit!! i already wrote your bullshit arguments in last post, where you could not answer anything any more. you cant remember very long. i trade with banks, worked in bank, trade with prime brokers,... it makes angry ...
Central Banks & Big Players
- dukas_trader replied Sep 6, 2017
oh oh, tony again. you tell all the time you was in bank where was no slippage with big amounts in biggest news! open account there! you cant because you fake only money and still trades with mini mini order amounts. thats the joke! and then you cry ...
Central Banks & Big Players
- dukas_trader replied Sep 6, 2017
to 1: you can do so, but smarter is closing the trade then hedging it. to 2. will not work, after closing one site your have again margin for this still open site. only wasted money.
Can we really beat trading costs?
- dukas_trader replied Sep 6, 2017
ofcourse hedging you pay 2 times. many brokers have "close by" option to avoid it and close one with other. but hedging is in 99,99% of the cases because of no plan in math and beginner style, no more advanced trader will use it, or at least he is ...
Can we really beat trading costs?
- dukas_trader replied Sep 6, 2017
your highlited sentence is wrong! you pay not 2 times the spread (correct is one time true payed spread)! you pay one time the difference between average price and ask plus one time average price and bid. i think he was putting in this sentence by ...
Can we really beat trading costs?
- dukas_trader replied Sep 5, 2017
i dont understand this point. you pay the spread both times, but both times only half the spread (ask-average price, average price-bid), so its one spread not twice (all for fix spread, for variable spread you need a true payed spread calculation, ...
Can we really beat trading costs?
- dukas_trader replied Sep 5, 2017
very easy to answer here: many cant, some can.
Can we really beat trading costs?
- dukas_trader replied Sep 5, 2017
really complete wrong. we speak about optimization with same spread always. only lotsize was changed. so your arguments cant be true.
Backtesting phenomenon
- dukas_trader replied Sep 5, 2017
but then it would be for all lotsizes. sounds not logic. and 1 lot had higher equity then 2 lots. really, i cant see your point, by math all is speaking against your own arguments.
Backtesting phenomenon
- dukas_trader replied Sep 5, 2017
really? his picture is from 60% progress time. just normal that equity is not same like balance when trades are in. (ok on optimization mode maybe not important). is not always only equity important? balance is complete useless, i know noone using ...
Backtesting phenomenon
- dukas_trader replied Sep 5, 2017
what strategy you use? i would say your account is not big enough for more then 3 lots with your strategy and you got maybe many margin calls in this time and so you had many closing positions against until 3 lots? or do you use martingale or many ...
Backtesting phenomenon
- dukas_trader replied Sep 4, 2017
aussi has other problems, he is not very smart in what he writes , has many mistakes in is sentences , is not very experienced. but because he dont take money i dont think he is a scammer. he cant win any discussion in a good topic with his ...
Scammers - Hall of Shame
- dukas_trader replied Sep 2, 2017
impossible, when you have this no or 2 pip slippage. something then is not honest. straddle will work better when you dont have high slippage, your stop out stoploss is same like the stop in stoporder. so why you are not in with 2 pip slippage in ...
Central Banks & Big Players
- dukas_trader replied Sep 2, 2017
ok. to say it more clear. tony is only telling very stupid things, because he is only often faking experience. in all his sentences you can see many wrong things and posing. but to your text: you write you get 2 pip slippage with oanda. ok thats ...
Central Banks & Big Players