Search | Crypto Craft
  • Search Crypto Craft
Posts by Trader
Website
Forum Posts
News Posts
Posts by Trader
    Advanced Search Options
    Post Types (all, none)
    Websites (all, none)
    Post Attachments (all, none)
    Sort Results By
    Date Range
    Back to Basic Search
    • AntiCre replied Dec 31, 2019

      An addendum to the previous post ans some furhter probabilities ... Assume that the first 4 numbers of a sequence of interest (e.g. close prices) doesn't contain an increasing or decreasing subsequence. What is the probability that the last, fifth ...

      The similarity system
    • AntiCre replied Dec 29, 2019

      It seems like I'm recurring to this old shit at least once a year ... This time I played around with Eurusdd's 5-linear subsequence theorem ... I know that your post is rather old. Nevertheless, maybe you are interested in why you didn't came close ...

      The similarity system
    • AntiCre replied Dec 15, 2019

      Do you have any idea/have any chance to overcome these triangles? I created and tested a multitude of strategies (e.g. mean reversion, reversal, grid trading, etc.) and they all failed in the long run because of these f***ing triangles. I already ...

      Simple Mathematical System
    • AntiCre replied Dec 11, 2019

      Forget about R:R. It's irrelevant. What counts is the winning percentage! Win % = % won - % lost And don't forget to account for spread, slippage, etc. And, of course, 12 weeks are not enough by far to rely on the strategy.

      65% win rate
    • AntiCre replied Oct 5, 2019

      Thanks for pointing this out! RR imho is the biggest BS. People tell you to use a good RR, e.g. risking 1 bucks for a 5 buck return. But they don't realize that changing the RR will change your winning %, too. In the case of RR = 1:5 and under the ...

      Flipping a system around
    • AntiCre replied Aug 20, 2019

      Common gals, Nazeer7 is new here. And merlin is a wizard! Do you really believe that wizards can't enchant prices and indicators? The method is stated on the 1st page. It is written on the internet. So, why shouldn't it be a reliable source?

      AMAZING Strategy!!!
    • AntiCre replied Jul 9, 2019

      Hi TD, please let me ask two questions: What is the reason that you've estimated both probabilities over a particular limited data set? What was the lookback period of your calculation (how many weeks does it incorporate)? Are you factoring in the ...

      High/Low Strike
    • AntiCre replied Jun 18, 2019

      video Ooooooorrrrdeeeeeerrrrr! Please let me add to this discussion ... I think what TracingDelta meant is that you first should collect some info on price behaviour around your line. For reasons of simplicity let's chose the open price of ...

      High/Low Strike
    • AntiCre replied Jun 17, 2019

      That's not true. If price would be purely random there would be ways to be profitable as well as if prize is deterministic ... It just depends on the kind of random walk. Assume that the prize increments are normally distributed. In that case BB's ...

      High/Low Strike
    • AntiCre replied Jun 14, 2019

      That's not a problem, is it? When price often crosses the open line then it won't deviate much from it. Thus, the DD is small in the meantime. Of course, I can't answer it. But I guess there could be lines with higher "relevance" - just like there ...

      High/Low Strike
    • AntiCre replied Jun 14, 2019

      Oh no - not higher edge within a single candlestick again So, it seems like you've solved the problem of the SL position and when (after how many open line closes) to enter?!

      High/Low Strike