my dry humor is probably too dry

Prop Firm Hub

Maybe they just moved their jurisdiction to the nearby Virgin Island, I don't know. Maybe I had it wrong from the beginning. As for the strategy - my strategy is based on placing random trades. I trade it during all phases. So you say I'm safe with ...

Prop Firm Hub

Same here. Most of them are actually on my personal blacklist (which doesn't mean they cannot be trusted per se but eg. employ some stupid rules etc.) Just a few examples: - Glow Node Limited prohibited grid/martingale without specification; cannot ...

Prop Firm Hub

Seems like a pure nonsense to me. If 90% are internalized then they don't represent any risk to the broker (orders are matched among the traders and result in zero net exposure). The remaining 10% are usually hedged on the market as part of the risk ...

Prop Firm Hub

Because they don't give a f about the trading styles. They look for the most efficient way of preventing larger payouts

Prop Firm Hub

For 5-figure payouts I prefer firms that understand what they do allow and what they don't without changing their mind every other day

Prop Firm Hub

Don't waste your mental capacity on that. It will change tomorrow anyways

Prop Firm Hub

You're possibly right. That's why I don't want to trade with firms who have such useless rules which get changed every other day anyways. Waste of my old brain's capacity

Prop Firm Hub

one order mistakenly placed at the wrong side of the previous one by 1 pip and your whole funded account is screwed. You might be in a huge profit overall and miles away from the DD but rules are rules. Great but no, thank you

Prop Firm Hub

Might be clear at one moment in time. But too many rules being changed too frequently make it a mess while all that should really matter is the DD and not misusing the MT demo environment (which non of the DCA, grid and martingale do)

Prop Firm Hub

Kaler is a clown

Prop Firm Hub

bigger lot size? 1 vs 10 maybe?

Prop Firm Hub

I don't get it either. After all the noise I also thought they would pay me the bonus they advertised. But instead, they extended their rules to prohibit scaling into a position (which is what I do, and what I've done in the evaluation), repeated to ...

Prop Firm Hub

They still didn't pay me the phase 1+2 bonus. So no, nothing bad so far except for they owe me some $7-8,000. In this case, why should I waste more time on them? My time is valuable, I'm not gonna waste it with someone who cheated me. Others (except ...

Prop Firm Hub

There were no profits on the funded account. I passed phases 1+2 and they were supposed to give me funded account. Bu they didn't. Why would I invest time into trading the funded account with someone I don't trust? They would only fabricate another ...

Prop Firm Hub

I did get the refund. But they still owe me bonus of phase 1 and 2 which they advertised. They never paid it to me. It was many times more than the fee. It was 400K account and maybe some 15% of those P1+P2? IDK and IDC any more anyways. It's over. ...

Prop Firm Hub

This reminds me how Bespoke treated me. I placed a standard manual trades and passed. They confirmed. Later they said I used martingale. I provided evidence this was not true. They said ok, it wasn't martingale but grid (wtf???). I proved them wrong ...

Prop Firm Hub

Using one entity for evaluation and another one for "funded" trading is nothing alarming. Many prop firms have them separated, even FTMO (and MFF) Breaching account due to using HFT would be a legitimate reason if they provided an evidence. But many ...

Prop Firm Hub

So far CFTC is doing great in this regard indeed. It is now definitely much easier to to pass with MFF. I only hope they won't "improve" the service of other prop firms in the same way. You cannot be serious about what you wrote...

Prop Firm Hub

yes, cTrader. I prefer dark but mobile looks better in light (sadly you cannot chose it on mobile).

Prop Firm Hub