Give this version a shot. Period() changed to PERIOD_MN1 - this can be multiplied out on the same line if you need to increase this OBJ_TREND now has RAY property turned on

I will code your EAs and Indicators for no charge

HI Giraia_BR, Here is a script that will perform what you request. You have inputs for both SL and TP percentages, as well as how many bars back , which is currently defaulting to 1.

I will code your EAs and Indicators for no charge

HI Ecryptom, Here is your script , Lots are currently set at 0.01, and Bars back = 1 .

I will code your EAs and Indicators for no charge

Line 111 is a limiting factor - its currently set for Period() * 1200, so despite extending the lines,(by using OBJ_TREND, and Ray on/off) once you reach >1200, it will no longer be able to locate the value of the line(s); You can increase this to ...

I will code your EAs and Indicators for no charge

Usmanshafeen, I think I understand what your asking, but I have a different problem with this code that requires someone smarter than me to solve I believe I fixed this New version and source have been uploaded. You will need to ...

I will code your EAs and Indicators for no charge

Which version number is working - 1 or 2 ? I found both were working on my tester , but I didnt test anything < 15 minute chart...not sure if that matters

I will code your EAs and Indicators for no charge

This is closer to what your looking for I think. There is an additional input called DistanceFromPrice2 - this changes the distance for the Close lines. Current default is 40 pips. Don't uncomment lines 46 - 47 - doing so will cause the lines to ...

I will code your EAs and Indicators for no charge

I made the changes you requested....I am however not convinced this is working as intended. When I run this via the system tester, the lines are not moving after being initially placed. I have added 2 additional commented lines (Lines 43 and 44) , ...

I will code your EAs and Indicators for no charge

I think this is the next ultimate target Since I can't post anything better than what RickM has already said - I am re-posting his post.

Real or Algo

Your right, its not easy. I had to deal with -25 pip drawdown before this came back. I'm sorry if you got offended by my trades, I thought I made it clear in the posts why I took the trades.... Regardless, I'll stop posting trades from now on.

Real or Algo

2nd attempt. long this time

Real or Algo

Ok...that was interesting .

Real or Algo

image Hopefully I am getting this....algo seems to want to fill in the blanks

Real or Algo

As I recall reading from George's thread - True TMA is a variation of LWMA. Here is a link to the source code from someone who figured it out. I would like to point out (as did GeorgeAUS and Moodybot here) that this is not the end all/be all. I ...

Real or Algo

Its been my experience due to the triangular nature of how currency moves, when you see your pattern as you posted, you typically will see moves on two different pairs of this triangle. Ie - you posted EC, and the moves are seen in UC and EU

Real or Algo

Yes - RickM's had a red line at approx 128.314

Real or Algo

I'm not disagreeing - but why that one and not RickM's target (which is significantly lower) ? Or is this a situation where both can be true, but the Upper target must be cleared out first?

Real or Algo

That's his point - he's attempting to take 3k and turn it into 40 Million

What Would It Take: $3,000 to $40 Million in FX

I say Open. If your not going to read the chat texts while your trading, then having Moodybot and Bluesteele observing isn't going to change anything.

What Would It Take: $3,000 to $40 Million in FX

R4M, I 'm not sure this has any relevancy, but EVERY example that is experiencing this has all sell orders. -Almo

(binned per thread starter’s request) MM (Money Maker) Detective