- Search Crypto Craft
- 408 Results (11 Threads, 397 Replies)
-
Relativity replied Jun 16, 2016Just to post something up since what happened today is a very good example : image One can just see statistical wise, its good enough to just follow the current line direction both just before and after news. This is especially true when price is ...
The Scientific Method : MMLC (major move life cycle) v12
-
Relativity replied Jan 12, 2016Not trying to hijack your thread but I've (silently) learned a lot from the commentary you provided in this thread: -Solid analysis helps with improving trader's patience and vice versa -I am amazed by the amount of patience you have for your ...
Hyperion's Notebook
-
Relativity replied Jan 12, 2016Yes usually its about 1 Standard Deviation but it leads onto your next point : .... which is one of the current (good) headaches I have now. Strong = how strong of the initial vertical movement? The strength of this move determines the size of the ...
Hyperion's Notebook
-
Relativity replied Jan 11, 2016#1- #2- "Go with" or "go against". #3- Good questions. I don't use capflow but I understand your questions within the context of my own work (wave analysis). This is a classical 1-2-3 move. image I had found good answers for #2 when I measured the ...
Hyperion's Notebook
-
Relativity replied Nov 19, 2015All right, time for me to bow out of this thread. Its been only two weeks, but the thread's purpose (and extended purpose) has been sufficiently fulfilled. My target audience is just to have a few peeps who are able to fulfill the requirements ...
The Scientific Method : MMLC (major move life cycle) v12
-
Relativity replied Nov 19, 2015I am sorry but this thread is not about 'answer from Relativity is the best'. Please don't make that assumption. In fact I respect Pete's work and answers because he has shown clearly that he did try the instructions, and did found 'something'. And ...
The Scientific Method : MMLC (major move life cycle) v12
-
Relativity replied Nov 19, 2015I would explain a little further why I don't wish the indicator to be posted. I did wish I myself can put out the lite version of the indicator out, but I learned the hard way that this isn't going to help anyone. They are not going to build up the ...
The Scientific Method : MMLC (major move life cycle) v12
-
Relativity replied Nov 19, 2015Thank you Pete. Yes that's a good starting point but I have my problem with the tubbs model too. I mentioned this earlier, that the lack of practicality prevents others from ulitizing the model to the best possible. That being said, its still a ...
The Scientific Method : MMLC (major move life cycle) v12
-
Relativity replied Nov 19, 2015I am sorry but I don't have to explain that. It's already right in front of us, that part of the swing formula does it. And I will not answer questions further that is not sufficiently related to the purpose of this thread. That's why the ...
The Scientific Method : MMLC (major move life cycle) v12
-
Relativity replied Nov 19, 2015image Please note that this is just the general model. The specifics... frankly... I don't feel like posting... haha.... because the general is really good enough for most to get some idea. To be able to obtain this general model from the research ...
The Scientific Method : MMLC (major move life cycle) v12
-
Relativity replied Nov 18, 2015The name was based off pure observation over the years before I eventually improved and solidified the current version of MMLC. Each independent swing, within its internals, go through certain phrases in my experience. For this example; ...
The Scientific Method : MMLC (major move life cycle) v12
-
Relativity replied Nov 18, 2015I've decided to perform some Out of Sample and Overlapping sample testing. Each shift of data would be 54 weeks worth. I did 4 sets, which meant data back to late 2010 I am quite surprised that 15 pips is an optimal number, given all the Frequency ...
The Scientific Method : MMLC (major move life cycle) v12
-
Relativity replied Nov 17, 2015Decided to post this because its quite fun to be able to anticipate in advanced, the important levels price tends to respect/break. image Update : image
The Scientific Method : MMLC (major move life cycle) v12
-
Relativity replied Nov 16, 2015MF-V does have acceptable english versions of his work, which could be found online. I actually tried to model some kind of wave theory in my older works (Rel's Lab and Rel's Forge). Unfortunately that faded away because I figured on a practical ...
The Scientific Method : MMLC (major move life cycle) v12
-
Relativity replied Nov 16, 2015You mean MF-V's work? Well, I didn't require vodka, but his works really opened my eyes that the market, to a certain degree, is predictable. I didn't read Darkstar's book, but I've heard of it. I didn't do more 'advanced' statistics since I am no ...
The Scientific Method : MMLC (major move life cycle) v12
-
Relativity replied Nov 16, 2015Poll to Further Advance this thread : Poll is closed. Results for the poll; Example of Research Process for a potential Additional Component? -Yes = 9 Votes (blueseahorse, LiquidGenius, manish9300, Neio, pete7, Rparm, Wanderer272, woww, xux99) ...
The Scientific Method : MMLC (major move life cycle) v12
-
Relativity replied Nov 16, 2015Ohh... I think to properly term what you really meant is 'per trade duration'. Frankly, I can't remember where I read some advice (in FF forums, yes, here) from a pretty good trader. He said that if one is undercapitalized (most of us are), he/she ...
The Scientific Method : MMLC (major move life cycle) v12
-
Relativity replied Nov 16, 2015Thanks Silver =) I actually don't understand your question... the results I posted and they had timeframes of only m1, m5, ,m15? Sometimes largerTF based on how long I held the trades for? Are you actually referring to the results in Trade Explorer, ...
The Scientific Method : MMLC (major move life cycle) v12
-
Relativity replied Nov 15, 2015I have placed a poll to decide further additional progression of this thread.
The Scientific Method : MMLC (major move life cycle) v12
-
Relativity replied Nov 15, 2015Generally what you posted is true but... there are parts of it based off my experience, are not practical. Not trying to pour cold water over your efforts, but I felt you would need 'something else', as it appears you are at a very early stage of ...
The Scientific Method : MMLC (major move life cycle) v12