- Search Crypto Craft
-
saltcafe replied Sep 22, 2006fb 63H02 results — After a stellar performance earlier ... it seems to be all going the wrong way. Here are the results for M1 charts.
Firebird EA - fixed version -
-
saltcafe replied Sep 22, 2006timeframe for testing — I'd say that there is little chance of testing a scalping system unless you had access to tick data (which I don't). For my purposes M1 is more then adequate. I'm looking for a system that may place 1-3 trades a day for ...
MetaTrader BackTesting, Reliable or Not??
-
saltcafe replied Sep 21, 2006Default settings — I used the default settings ... didn't modify a single value. I ran it on all of the pairs listed with my broker for the M1 charts. For the M5 I took more of the majors (8 pairs as can be seen in the statement). I would ...
Firebird EA - fixed version -
-
saltcafe replied Sep 21, 2006Great information - Thank you — Is this something that is located in the help file? or are you one of the developers of the system? At least now I can feel better that at least I've done all that is possible to improve the results. Reading ...
MetaTrader BackTesting, Reliable or Not??
-
saltcafe replied Sep 20, 2006Compare M1 to M5 charts — I'm not sure if everybody has the same or similar opinion, but I'd say that running FB on M1 charts is a brokers dream come true ... so many trades and so many times that they take the spread from you, and remeber ...
Firebird EA - fixed version -
-
saltcafe replied Sep 20, 2006FireBirdv63H02 results for M5 on 8 pairs — Here are results on a demo account with 8 pairs on M5 charts.
Firebird EA - fixed version -
-
saltcafe replied Sep 20, 200612 pairs with Firebird v63H02 results — I thought that I should post some results of a test that I'm running at the moment. It is on M1 and on 12 ccy pairs running over the last week or so on demo account.
Firebird EA - fixed version -
-
saltcafe replied Sep 20, 2006Exact link please — Sorry to be a bother, but do you have the exact link for that info? I've tried looking and couldn't find it ... must be missing something obvious.
MarketMakers
-
saltcafe replied Sep 20, 2006Now if only that text were to tell you HOW to ACTUALLY IMPROVE your modelling results, then it would actually be useful. I have read the help file and found no information on actually WHY it is 90% or 80% or 70% or ... What the help file is missing ...
MetaTrader BackTesting, Reliable or Not??
-
saltcafe replied Sep 19, 2006What influences the modelling quality parameter? — Me personally, I'd like to know what actually influences that parameter? ie. what can I do to get it to approach 100%? and if I have loaded the M1 data then why the heck isn't it coming close ...
MetaTrader BackTesting, Reliable or Not??
-
saltcafe replied Sep 18, 2006What about if you are not in the US? — What about other requlatory bodies around the world, like UK, Switzerland or EU in general, Japan or Hong Kong or Asia? Do you know where to get similar information like this?
MarketMakers
-
saltcafe replied Sep 8, 2006FireBirdv63H02 results — posted above were some numbers for v63H02 version. seems to be good during normal market volatility, but gets hammarred during highly volatile markets, and can whipe you out quite quick. for now it seems to be spinning ...
Firebird EA - fixed version -
-
saltcafe replied Sep 8, 2006Results for H02 — I've been testing the H02 fro the last couple of days and would be happy to post the results, but don't know how to generate those statement reports. Anybody care to share how to generate them?
Firebird EA - fixed version -