- Search Crypto Craft
- jacson101 replied Oct 29, 2011
Does not feel bad at all.
kind thanks, video Technical Analysis Fallacy
- jacson101 replied Oct 27, 2011
Yes 50%. Not sure how it solves a solvency( bankruptcy) problem with more liquidity though. Oh well no matter print, print, print we'll all figure it out later.
Technical Analysis Fallacy
- jacson101 replied Oct 23, 2011
True Story. I' ve met fish with more grey matter. Rgds. video Technical Analysis Fallacy
- jacson101 replied Oct 22, 2011
I just told you, please take more than a moment on what I've said. In low volatility: buyer==seller, with a bank in between. In high volatility: buyer=========seller, with a bank in between. Banks, speculators, corps each has a different operating ...
Technical Analysis Fallacy
- jacson101 replied Oct 22, 2011
Volatility can be created by buyers and sellers having very different views on the instrument traded. I don't like to worry about smart and stupid money too much. One minute can be smart the next moment it all seems stupid in battle. I just like to ...
Technical Analysis Fallacy
- jacson101 replied Oct 20, 2011
I don't think healthcare is free anywhere, each pays their "fair" share of tax for the service. Rgds
Technical Analysis Fallacy
- jacson101 replied Oct 16, 2011
I was not around early on enough DA, but my well wishes go out nonetheless. Rgds J
Technical Analysis Fallacy
- jacson101 replied Oct 13, 2011
You are leaving everyone here everything they will ever need to know about trading. Thank you for helping me as well.
My hope is this not a hard and fast goodbye, please stay in touch with us. Rgds sir.Technical Analysis Fallacy
- jacson101 replied Oct 11, 2011
No problem sir, I should be the one lined off for being too slow. Book light, carry weights, watch for swing high failure, markets have no more time for e/u games Signing off
RgdsTechnical Analysis Fallacy
- jacson101 replied Oct 11, 2011
yes sir, needs room to breath. That was fast, I think you lifted my offer on the first round. rgdsTechnical Analysis Fallacy
- jacson101 replied Oct 11, 2011
showing 48 back up, book needs rest

flat bid now size, carefulTechnical Analysis Fallacy
- jacson101 replied Oct 11, 2011
seen that huh
yep, fencing off 65's, who bleeds.Technical Analysis Fallacy
- jacson101 replied Oct 11, 2011

yep, heavy enough for now, I don't think it can run through panda. Black eyes leave bad taste. add 1 same average rgds sirTechnical Analysis Fallacy
- jacson101 replied Oct 11, 2011
Keeping high skews close to market, feel for 60s high. Will try to fence it in. Rumors panda was off e/u 137.

Technical Analysis Fallacy
- jacson101 replied Oct 10, 2011
Understood thank you sir.
Long day, yeah flying sinks.
Crazy vols..I`m not sure 136 can hold without at test of 135 fig I not sure but tiered sales staff are saying +30% on greece. RgdsTechnical Analysis Fallacy