- Search Crypto Craft
- Orest replied Jan 30, 2010
Schmurex, it's good you have been sharpening your programming skills, but let me tell you... I was trying a lot of multi-currency indicators like this one you've shown. I just couldn't get my head around them. The thing is they all show the history, ...
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- Orest replied Jan 30, 2010
That's the easy one. I have generic BUY/SELL scripts for IBFX pairs. Set miniIBFX parameter to False if you have just standard account.
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- Orest replied Jan 27, 2010
I see you point, oplin. I will fix that in the next version.
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- Orest replied Jan 27, 2010
Sorry klhh, the purpose of newer versions is fixing leftover bugs. I would be doomed if I go back and fix those bugs in older versions, just too many of them.
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- Orest replied Jan 11, 2010
We have a major misunderstanding here. You said you wanted anti-martingale (increasing lot when your trade is positive), now you are saying re-enter at 15 or 20 pips further out when a trade is against you. How to re-enter? Same lot size? Increased ...
EA reverse martingale
- Orest replied Jan 10, 2010
Give me a proven system with positive probability expectancy of 100 pips of profit over 15 pips of loss and I'll write you a code for MM described above in 15 min.
You didn't say anything about very first trade, so I assumed it also has 15 pips ...EA reverse martingale
- Orest replied Jan 8, 2010
Well, I know a bunch of those who say they are earning.
I guess it's very personal. Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- Orest replied Jan 5, 2010
Hi klhh, I believe I fixed this problem. Please take the updated version from post#1.
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- Orest replied Dec 16, 2009
Ahmad, we had such feature in earlier versions, it very hard to analyze visually how a pair jumps from one slot to another.
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- Orest replied Dec 16, 2009
Unfortunately, it turns out it can not be if we don't give up continuous requests for fresh data every 2 seconds. We have endless loop for implementing this and indicator requires a thread to be completed on every tick. So, I guess we will live with ...
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- Orest replied Dec 16, 2009
My understanding was it takes in account pairs with positive equity only. So, if your BUY pairs equity > 0 it draws green bar, if SELL pair equity>0 it draws red bar. Pairs having negative equity are discarded. What's why you have red/green bars ...
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- Orest replied Dec 10, 2009
No folks, sorry - I don't do alerts.
Here is another I think quite interesting "what-if" indicator from alpari.ru forum. What it basically does is: - it allows you "open" your basket any time back (like we have 30 days ago column). This is a ...Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- Orest replied Dec 9, 2009
Empori, thanks for sharing, but with all due respect I don't see much difference comparing with what we have now in current indicator. The code even have my copyright
. The only feature what I see was added is a breakdown total by each currency. ...Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- Orest replied Dec 8, 2009
Sorry, my bad. Please take it from post #1, where it's supposed to be. Orest
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- Orest replied Dec 8, 2009
Hey Zizou, have you tried the ADX version (a couple posts above)? Your bottom screen is implemented there. lol First column is ADX at the beginning of the period and second is current ADX.
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- Orest replied Dec 8, 2009
Folks, I'm not arguing, the numbers at the up/down arrows just didn't make sense and needed to be replaced with something. If you come up with some better idea then let me know. Meanwhile here is version 1.16 for you to try. @Skyline - nice job as ...
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- Orest replied Dec 7, 2009
What do you guys think? This is from newer version I've been working on. First ADX column (per pair) is ADX value on the beginning of the period and second is current ADX. Does that make sense?
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- Orest replied Dec 6, 2009
Thanks for drawing my attention to this issue, it really doesn't work correctly. Besides that data is pretty useless anyway, who cares how many pips the pair gains/loses since the last request. What I'm gonna do though is I will re-write that piece ...
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- Orest replied Dec 4, 2009
Come on guys, it's not 4 dimensional cube we are talking about here.
Up and down arrows - well, they are obviously showing pair's movement, where it's going. Number shows how much it has gone so far. Yes, you need some non-standard imagination to ...Indicators development for T101's not very simple method