Got it. For the script, are you trying to hedge with the grid? So to have the flexible input of pending orders. May I know the rule of diversification? Not sure where should I place the pending orders. Edit: EA is done. Please check.

Profitable Grid Break-out Trading System(PGBTS)

I think EA and script should be the same function. So there is no necessary to code script. And could you please explain on the number 6? Thanks.

Profitable Grid Break-out Trading System(PGBTS)

I personally don't think is a good result, since I did many test for the same scenario (Open Long & short order at same price or different price level with grid, and different RR). what I know buylimit and selllimit orders would be the best after I ...

I will code your EAs and Indicators for no charge

I have the new code EA since last time you changed your system, i did PM you but you didn't reply me. Not sure if you didn't receive my PM, forgot to reply me or didn't need it at the time.

Profitable Grid Break-out Trading System(PGBTS)

In the beginning of EA, extern int TrailingStop=40; You need a function to output "point" here, so to proceed with Trail function (because it need "point" value for input) In somewhere of the EA that you need trail the price, code..... ...

I will code your EAs and Indicators for no charge

Thanks for your comments. I basically like trend & SR only and dislike any indicator that time my entry and exit, for the logical moves (If price is up would continue to rise for uptrend, price would shift to another area eventually because of ...

I will code your EAs and Indicators for no charge

Use this. Input is TrailingStop and point. TrailingStop is distant in pips (40 for your case) point depends on 4 or 5 digit broker (0.0001 or 0.01) Magic_Num is order magic number void Trail(int TrailingStop, double point) { for (int i= ...

I will code your EAs and Indicators for no charge

I believe this would be a good system since i know if use SR area to trade would provide good result. The important point is the market must fluctuate up down frequently, and avoid trending. Then it would give many green pips. I would like to ...

I will code your EAs and Indicators for no charge

This pattern should be known by all our fellow trader here. Yes, if you rise the TF ,you would get better result. Frankly speaking, I am still looking for some kind of trading model to overcome stop loss issue, maybe martingale, trailing, hedging, ...

I will code your EAs and Indicators for no charge

Hi! I had been done this test in the past, but won't make up any profitable account. Had tried to scalp on all TF for each candlebar, sensitive MA, sensitive heikin ashi. This is only profitable if there is no stop loss, which I get a positive ...

I will code your EAs and Indicators for no charge

Yes, it need to do the math operation separately. Then it will have the precision value after i did some test. Another option, if i declare as "double risk" instead of "int risk", i would get correct value 36 for my original code in post 1621. So no ...

I will code your EAs and Indicators for no charge

OK. Thanks! Seem like normalizedouble is useless then. One more question, when would this issue be happened? Any math operation that involves dividing and floating point value?

I will code your EAs and Indicators for no charge

Yes, it return the same value as 36 36. But i don't understand the reason behind this. Is this due to (OrderLots()/Lots) =0.99999... so result would be 36*0.99=35.64 and risk is interger value, so risk=35 ? For this case now result is 36.00036 >> 36

I will code your EAs and Indicators for no charge

Now i try add this into print Print(risk," ",((OrderStopLoss()-OrderOpenPrice())/point)*(OrderLots()/Lots)); Here is the print result 2013.02.21 22:14:44 2008.01.02 16:08 TEST EURUSD,M1: 35 36 Not sure what is the problem. Is this a bug?

I will code your EAs and Indicators for no charge

Hi guys! Could someone help me this? I am really confusing. 1.4688=OrderOpenPrice 1.4724=OrderStopLoss 0.1=OrderLots 0.1=Lots 0.0001=point 1.4724-1.4688=0.0036 int risk=0; << Put in front of below looping code. Print(risk); ...

I will code your EAs and Indicators for no charge

Thanks for your comment. I have not done any test yet, but would like to hear traders comment and get more information, I might miss something else. Yes, I know that martingale method would eventually blow up trading account if many positions are ...

Price Action and Trading Discussion

Thank for your reply. This system is based on martingale method, so it is always win because position will only be closed if in profit. And martingale has been the common topic among forum, to average down the price. However, there is a risk for ...

Price Action and Trading Discussion

Hi guys! I would like to open discussion for the below method. I am trying to build a system with martingale + hedging, and this is 100% profitable system. For the example below, Pair 1: EURUSD Pair 2: GBPUSD Correlation: High positive correlation ...

Price Action and Trading Discussion

Hi guys! Can anyone give me advice or idea for what i have think of, below? I am trying to build a system with martingale + hedging, and this is 100% profitable system. For the example below, Pair 1: EURUSD Pair 2: GBPUSD Correlation: High positive ...

Overlay Positive Hedging EA

Hi guys! I am new to this thread. This thread now seems like discuss more about automobile stuffs, but is great! And are you Chinese, fti ? Noticed you did post those video with Chinese language, but i understand. I'm Chinese too. Btw, great ...

Technical Analysis Fallacy