- Search Crypto Craft
- DavidRP replied Nov 12, 2014
Same here I use Pepperstone. If we take the time of the post, the price was at 1.2424 yep
The similarity system
- DavidRP replied Nov 12, 2014
I dont want to attack Eurusd, just debating the probs, I can help people and him to test and calculate accurate probabilities.
The similarity system
- DavidRP replied Nov 12, 2014
mmm so the call was correct? 98% the price was supposed to close above 1.2440, after 270 min since his post. It closed below when that time elapsed. It was wrong, no problem, everybody can fail.
The similarity system
- DavidRP replied Nov 12, 2014
I'm not claiming he's BS, I think TZ has value, just said that those probs were wrong. I'm not a noob if u're claiming that. My probs are correct. Around 80% of the days the last high/low of the day (daiy range settled ) is made >=15h(Pepperstone ...
The similarity system
- DavidRP replied Nov 12, 2014
so if he fails 100 in a row you continue believing those probabilities? The probs where really wrong. 85% of the days the last low/high is made after 15h, it's very very rare to have the low (last low/high point of the day) at 11:40. So There were ...
The similarity system
- DavidRP replied Nov 4, 2014
total candes is what it say: candles, if there is a transient price inside it, I label the candle as transient. prices are all the prices visited, i.ex candle with high 1.3505 and low 1.3450. Prices are all the values between 1.3505 and 1.3450-> 55 ...
The similarity system
- DavidRP replied Nov 3, 2014
I have added a missed column, 6863515 were the total tested prices.The total T prices were 61729 (0.9% of 6863515). Probability of getting a T after one of those 61729 is 13.51%(8339) (CONDITIONAL PROBABILITY->same prices ar not independent). Big ...
The similarity system
- DavidRP replied Nov 3, 2014
EU H=4 FROM 2003 DUKASCOPY DATA h,totalCandles,transient candles,% transient candles,prices,% transient prices,2 consecutive,%,3 consecutive, %,4 consecutive,% 1 17853 6156 34.48 863640 103902 12.03 36680 35.3 13084 35.67 4650 35.54 2 17851 4934 ...
The similarity system
- DavidRP replied Nov 3, 2014
Here the stats (5min from 2003 data from Dukascopy) with colums: h, totalPrices,totalTransientPrices(%), total2consecutiveTprices, % of a price being T after being T,total3consecutives, % of begin T after being TT,total4consecutives, % of begin T ...
The similarity system
- DavidRP replied Nov 3, 2014
results were something like 15% or so (after one TZ) I will post them laterThe similarity system
- DavidRP replied Nov 3, 2014
I'm not disproving nothing, it was a surprise for me, and when taking a look close I discovered that it was because double and triple tops I will run the test later and post the results from 2003 with 5 min bars
The similarity system
- DavidRP replied Nov 3, 2014
of course I'm speaking about consecutive prices TZs Look any chart, and take a look of double tops you can find there consecutive Tzs
The similarity system
- DavidRP replied Nov 3, 2014
I have those numbers and they will surprise you, double tops and triple tops have a role here, it's not so rare to have another tz (for the same price) after having the first one. (Double tops i.e)
The similarity system
- DavidRP replied Oct 29, 2014
vlad take a look of my last post. it's clear the subsequence has not be sorted, so the last high can have many many values between the others values.
The similarity system
- DavidRP replied Oct 29, 2014
Wrong again with your example above 1.2344, 1.2566, 1.2211, 1.2222, xxxxx the last number could be 1.2220 and then you have a decreasing subsequence: 1.2566-1.2222-1.2220. That is was the theorem says. Nothing says that the last number has to be ...
The similarity system
- DavidRP replied Oct 29, 2014
ok But then, your example with 1.2211 is wrong I read very carefully this and it's WRONG "For example, suppose you chose your reals to be high of bars. The on the daily chart if you set n=2 then you need to look in the DNA for 5 bars. Let us suppose ...
The similarity system
- DavidRP replied Oct 29, 2014
when you have 0 1 2 3 4 5 , and n=2 you always can find a subsequence of 3 either increasing or decreasing but it doesnt have to be 0-1-2 or 2-3-4 or 3-4-5 it can be 0-2-5 or 1-3-4 or 0-4-5 so you can not predict that high must finish below or above ...
The similarity system
- DavidRP replied Oct 29, 2014
Sorry I meant high He is misundestanding the theorem. What the theorem assumes, is that you can always find a n+1 subsequence and it doesn't need to be sorted url
The similarity system