@Ullen I sent you a PM some days ago, so I thought I would tell you here in case you did not see. But, obviously, if you see it and that you prefer not to reply or just don't have much time I can understand too . 030985

Counter-trend trading

Everytime I read that kind of post with that wrong attitude, I know that I am reading a valuable thread. ( Not that I really needed confirmation though. ) I will just say that it is not because you consider it a garbage or a lie, that everyone ...

Counter-trend trading

Thank you very much for the clarification ! I am late, I have to catch up with what you posted next ^^' Your post with the 'averages' and also the last one about the driving currencies are very interesting. Thank you : ) All this is really becoming ...

Rel's Forge

I thought I would ask my question here : ) I am not sure how to read the price levels that your chart is showing : I can see, for example, that the yellow horizontal lines are the levels with most occurences and that the price may be attracted by ...

Rel's Forge

Thank you again for your reply. I think I totally understand what you are saying. I remembered when I stumbled upon the thread on BP, and thought "oh, that is a pity, maybe I am arriving too late" when I saw that you were open for collaboration. But ...

Rel's Lab

Thank you for this picture as I find it very inspirational in order to see what reasoning we may have, and that each time several alternatives are possible, but with different degrees of probabilities. I have stumbled upon this blog by chance ...

Rel's Lab

Thank you very much for your clarification ! Now, I will take some time to grasp what is contained in these lasts posts.

Rel's Lab

Thank you, this is interesting to see that both are indeed valuable information to have. Also, yes it makes sense finally not having to categorize them as your Swings may contain already the necessary information due to the way they are designed to ...

Rel's Lab

Thank you for your replies Relativity. Well, I guess you are already doing this (I mean if there is any useful information to get from it of course), but I would like to say what comes to my mind if we consider your question "How we do statistically ...

Rel's Lab

Thank you very much Relativity for your sharing now here, and before on Babypips. I did not participate on Babypips, also I am not at all in programming or coding, but I read it with great interest. It was really interesting to see the evolution and ...

Rel's Lab

Thank you very much iDoubleStoch for your yearly appearance and all the information you shared with unknown novices on the Internet, despite the constant negative attitude of the "pros who know it all" . I have read quite a lot of the contents you ...

Funny Looking Rectangles & Useless Drivel

Just to inform, in the end it was an issue on their side. Finally I sent them an email yesterday ( I sent one before that, but it seems the mail address I used as destinatory was wrong ), and they replied to me today, by saying they fixed the issue. ...

Forex Trading Philosophy

Hello, Firstly, thank you very much for this very interesting thread that makes you think. I have tried for several days to access this last link suggested by CrucialPoint, on two different computers and three different browsers, but it seems ...

Forex Trading Philosophy

Then, if price doesn't go above the high of 13:21GMT ( and so neither goes to 1.3570~ ) I will know that a tick above 1.35517 was not enough ( But if price goes above this 13:21GMT high and to 1.3570~ I won't know if the ticks near 13:20GMT were ...

EURUSD

A little question : Do you consider a specific timeframe for validating the close above 1.35517 ( as 1 minute bar, or 5 minutes, etc...) , or a tick at 1.35517 is enough ?

EURUSD