-
Ethereum Price Forecast: Active addresses halt growth as US selling pressure eases
Ethereum (ETH) network growth has stalled over the past week, halting an explosive rise over the past two months. Active addresses and transaction counts surged to record highs during the period despite a 42% in ETH's price. However, both metrics have begun to decline over the past week. The slowdown comes as prices have consolidated in the past two weeks following a sustained downtrend that spanned mid-January to early February. At the same time, ETH's Net Taker Volume on Binance has remained in negative territory since January, indicating short traders continue to dominate futures activity on the crypto exchange. ... (full story)
- Comments / Top
- Subscribe
-
Related Stories
*TRUMP’S GLOBAL TARIFFS STRUCK DOWN BY US SUPREME COURT 
Supreme Court of the United States: Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, President of the United States The question presented is whether the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) authorizes the President to impose tariffs. See 91 Stat. 1626. Shortly after taking office, President Trump sought to address two foreign threats: the influx of illegal drugs from Canada, Mexico, and China, Presidential Proclamation No. 10886, 90 Fed. Reg. 8327; Exec. Order No. 14193, 90 Fed. Reg. 9113; Exec. Order No. 14194, 90 Fed. Reg. 9117; Exec. Order No. 14195, 90 Fed. Reg. 9121, and “large and persistent” trade deficits, Exec. Order No. 14257, 90 Fed. Reg. 15041. The President determined that the drug influx had “created a public health crisis,” 90 Fed. Reg. 9113, and that the trade deficits had “led to the hollowing out” of the American manufacturing base and “undermined critical supply chains,” id., at 15041. The President declared a national emergency as to both threats, deeming them “unusual and extraordinary,” and invoked his authority under IEEPA to respond. He imposed tariffs to deal with each threat. As to the drug trafficking tariffs, the Pre *SUPREME COURT RULES 6-3 AGAINST TRUMP ON TARIFFS Supreme Court does not address eligibility for tariff refunds.
Supreme Court of the United States: Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, President of the United States The question presented is whether the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) authorizes the President to impose tariffs. See 91 Stat. 1626. Shortly after taking office, President Trump sought to address two foreign threats: the influx of illegal drugs from Canada, Mexico, and China, Presidential Proclamation No. 10886, 90 Fed. Reg. 8327; Exec. Order No. 14193, 90 Fed. Reg. 9113; Exec. Order No. 14194, 90 Fed. Reg. 9117; Exec. Order No. 14195, 90 Fed. Reg. 9121, and “large and persistent” trade deficits, Exec. Order No. 14257, 90 Fed. Reg. 15041. The President determined that the drug influx had “created a public health crisis,” 90 Fed. Reg. 9113, and that the trade deficits had “led to the hollowing out” of the American manufacturing base and “undermined critical supply chains,” id., at 15041. The President declared a national emergency as to both threats, deeming them “unusual and extraordinary,” and invoked his authority under IEEPA to respond. He imposed tariffs to deal with each threat. As to the drug trafficking tariffs, the Pre *SUPREME COURT RULES 6-3 AGAINST TRUMP ON TARIFFS Supreme Court does not address eligibility for tariff refunds.
US business activity rose at the weakest rate for ten months in February, according to early ‘flash’ PMI data, signaling a cooling of economic growth. Rates of expansion moderated in both manufacturing and services, reflecting weakened order book trends, in turn led by falling exports, though adverse weather was partly to blame. Employment rose only ...
TRUMP: TALKS WITH IRAN ARE GOING WELL TRUMP: HAVE TO DO A MEANINGFUL DEAL WITH IRAN *TRUMP: WILL FIND OUT OVER MAYBE 10 DAYS ABOUT PEACE IN MIDEAST TRUMP: WE MAY HAVE TO TAKE IT A STEP FURTHER ON IRAN TRUMP: THEY CAN'T HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON *TRUMP: TIME FOR IRAN TO JOIN US ON A PATH TO COMPLETE EFFORTS
