- Search Crypto Craft
- Takisd replied 4 hr ago
Oanda has been a bit dodgy throughout history. It started off well when the US companies had many competitors, but after the GFC it became junk. My opinion is that the costs of satisfying the regulator became too high and so it lead to a really poor ...
Prop Firm Hub
- Takisd replied 43 hr ago
Its what it seems like yes. But cannot be sure, he has been trying to bury it for long time because of the excess fees.
Prop Firm Hub
- Takisd replied Feb 13, 2025
Something interesting from the DEX leaks. December payout dip shouldnt existed as it would be from November flow. Something changed november for MFFU. image
Prop Firm Hub
- Takisd replied Feb 12, 2025
no even oanda doesn’t have darwinex level license. Oanda purchase is fine but I do not think it cures prop lack of regulation. Oanda is good for cash flow and personnel only. FTMO has a chance to do something great there but if their marketing is ...
Prop Firm Hub
- Takisd replied Feb 12, 2025
Its a very expensive licensing apparatus. I dont think any broker has the appetite for it. When Darwinex got it the process is far easier. Its easier to try to get something similar elsewhere and pass it off as the same.
Prop Firm Hub
- Takisd replied Feb 12, 2025
Yes the regulation that darwinex has though is almost unattainable. For a company to replicate will be hard, at least from a professional level. I think it can be done way better though and no one has really challenged them yet with any boundary ...
Prop Firm Hub
- Takisd replied Feb 12, 2025
If the model is restricted in any way, the offshore futures companies will take the market and the US ones will flop. People need to stop pretending that the majority of traders using these firms are even trying to do anything but gamble. If you cut ...
Prop Firm Hub
- Takisd replied Feb 12, 2025
Well, it looks like ex MFFX employee dex just dropped a nuclear weapon on X. url For what its worth, other than purple trading MFFX was always worse trading conditions to FTMO MFF 5ers and even TFT.
Prop Firm Hub
- Takisd replied Feb 12, 2025
I dont care about the politics, I care about the prop. Some how you made a bad decision by a prop into something political.
Prop Firm Hub
- Takisd replied Feb 12, 2025
ya'll missed the mark on both of the screenshots - but thats ok. How can you be a prop (even with 1% legitimacy) if you are pushing a now defunct scamcoin to trade? Yes yes, volatility, short all that jazz but this is extremely unprofessional. ...
Prop Firm Hub
- Takisd replied Feb 11, 2025
image Blueberry on my blacklist. They now have announced they are a casino by launching a scam coin for serious traders.
Prop Firm Hub
- Takisd replied Feb 10, 2025
No, fills are determined by the software + liquidity. Ctrader advocates like to pimp out ctrader because they think there is no slippage there but if there is no slippage it is fake. Ctrader have changed a bit but originally they had two options B ...
Prop Firm Hub
- Takisd replied Feb 9, 2025
there is a bit of an innovation rush going on in the background but not from people who we would expect to be innovating.
Prop Firm Hub
- Takisd replied Feb 9, 2025
Not me, someone else wanted some help. They already built a scoring system that in testing is quite robust but one of the questions is always the deviations. The scoring eliminate a lot of the prop nonsense (copy hedge etc) but the real question is ...
Prop Firm Hub
- Takisd replied Feb 8, 2025
I feel like both of you said different things but the consistent part seems to be that its a margin usage calculation.
Prop Firm Hub